Re: NS and intelligent designers

From: Nucacids@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:07:20 EDT

  • Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: The Future for ID"

    In a message dated 10/5/00 7:01:47 PM Dateline Standard Time,
    welsberr@inia.cls.org writes:

    << So? There are plenty of claims made by ID proponents where
     it *is* a problem. >>

    But others where it isn't. Remember people, the non-teleological view
    cannot tolerate even ONE example of teleological causation behind natural
    history. And it's the one I am talking about that provides the gestalt
    shift.

    Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:07:35 EDT