>>Mike Gene: Nevertheless, I have some questions for you.
1. Why do you have a need to label me in the first place?
Of all the arguments I posted to ARN (and here), you seem
obsessed only about this. Why?
2. In what specific way does the 'creationist' label better
help you understand my position? {this is all the more
important because experience has taught me that this
label actually makes it harder for others to understand
my position}.
3. You like Johnson's definition. Fine. So you also think Howard
Van Till is a creationist?
4. Francis Crick is well known for having proposed
directed panspermia. Is he also a creationist?
5. If the answer to 3 and 4 is No, why?
If the answer to 3 and 4 is Yes, consider the following
scenario:
Henry Morris, from the ICR, is being interviewed by CNN.
He is asked if there are any other scholars outside the ICR
who are creationists. He says, "Why yes, Howard Van Till and
Francis Crick come to mind."
Now, would anyone accuse Morris of being misleading??
DN...er, Mike
************************************
DNAunion: Nicely said - pat pat on the back :-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:51:44 EDT