>>SeJones: Today I received posts on the List from DNAunion@aol.com with
the titles:
>Chris Cogan: Entropy (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 08:58:58 EDT)
>Could it be that FMAJ finally gets it????? (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 06:20:34 EDT)
>Susan's at it again (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 05:47:26 EDT)
>FMAJ and his outdated support of abiogenesis (Sat Oct 21 2000 - 04:55:48
EDT)
I regard putting fellow Reflectorites names in subject lines as a form of ad
hominem. >>
DNAunion: I already responded but found something that shows even more
clearly that I was not resorting to ad homs in my titles. SeJones left out
the title of one my posts, which was:
*Sinners vs. Saints (i.e., DNAunion vs anti-IDists)*
I included my own name in a title, and associated it with the term "sinners".
Now, was I ad homming myself? If not, then why think that I was ad homming
others when I did not associate such negative terms as "sinners" to them?
Nothing against SeJones, I just want to present the best case for myself that
I can.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 22 2000 - 23:50:27 EDT