Re: The Future for ID

From: Ivar Ylvisaker (ylvisaki@erols.com)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:18:21 EDT

Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: CSI, GAs, etc."

Previous message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Really?"
In reply to: Nucacids@aol.com: "Re: The Future for ID"
Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: The Future for ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

How are scientists supposed to verify teleology experimentally?

If they can not, are you writing about science?

I am assuming that the omniscient, omnipotent great wizard hypothesis
that cannot be falsified by any possible observation is not an
acceptable scientific hypothesis.

I am also excluding man as the purposeful, intelligent being.

Ivar

Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: CSI, GAs, etc."
Previous message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Really?"
In reply to: Nucacids@aol.com: "Re: The Future for ID"
Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: The Future for ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 01:18:25 EDT