In a message dated 10/5/2000 10:42:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
DNAunion@aol.com writes:
> >DNAunion: Two things. First, what I believe to be a correction to your
> final sentence.
>
> "Surely a time will come when neo Darwinists will have to stop claiming all
> opposition to [the claimed unlimited creative powers of] "random variation
> and natural selection" equals religious fundamentalism."
>
> I don't think any of the IDists you listed denies that RM & NS occurs and
> produces biological change, just that it has limitations that intelligence
> accounts for much better.
Perhaps but the Intelligent Design filters cannot exclude natural selection
as an intelligent designer so perhaps intelligence as used by you is
different from the intelligence as used by the ID movement?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 15:18:29 EDT