In a message dated 10/8/2000 10:28:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, DNAunion
writes:
> >FMAJ: Then please explain why ID cannot eliminate it as such? Merely
> defining it
> out of existance because it is inconvenient to think of ID as intelligent
> designer hardly makes for a satisfying argument. Show why natural selection
> can be excluded as a designer when design has been infered.
>
>
> Wesley Elsberry: "The apparent, but unstated, logic behind the move from
> design to ... "
> http://inia.cls.org/~welsberr/zgists/wre/papers/dembski7.html
>
> DNAunion: Polly want a cracker?
>
I am glad to hear that you have no rebuttal.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 11 2000 - 01:05:09 EDT