My thanks to the lurkers (committed or uncommitted) who responded to my
appeal. It's nice to know that *someone* is following the discussions here.
By my count, we had only two responses, and one of those described himself
as a creationist, so should not be considered uncommitted. (By committed, I
don't mean irrevocably wed to a position. I just mean that one has, for the
time being, made up one's mind.)
So it seems we only have evidence of *one* uncommitted lurker. Perhaps
Stephen should in future refer to "uncommitted lurker" in the singular. ;-)
(I'm joking, really. Given the number of subscribers to the Reflector, I
expect there are a few more uncommitted lurkers out there, who prefer to
remain anonymous. But it's impossible to know whether there are many, as
there are no doubt also other lurkers are already committed, as well as
subscribers who rarely read the posts.)
Richard Wein (Tich)
--------------------------------
"Do the calculation. Take the numbers seriously. See if the underlying
probabilities really are small enough to yield design."
-- W. A. Dembski, who has never presented any calculation to back up his
claim to have detected Intelligent Design in life.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 22 2000 - 06:53:51 EDT