In a message dated 10/3/2000 7:35:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, DNAunion
writes:
> >> Susan: what!? creationists being dishonest?!
>
> >>DNAunion: What? Atheistic Nazi's not being able to distinguish between
> ID and Creationism!
>
> >>>FMAJ: That is totally uncalled for and imho very insulting.
>
> DNAunion: Yes, I agree that Huxter's implications and Susan's comments
> were totally uncalled for and very insulting. As has been shown, Huxter's
> claims about me are totally false.
>
Even if that is the case, your accusation about Atheistic Nazi's is totally
out of line and uncalled for
> Susan did not need to here the evidence - she simply assumed that I and the
> others are guilty. And on top of her assumption based on not a single
> shread of evidence, Susan then adds injury to insult by calling me a
> Creationist and dishonest (not to mention her later implication that my/our
> arguments are based on ignorance). I am not a Creationist and do not
> appreciated being called one as an insult - as Susan obviously intended.
> Furthermore, I am not dishonest, and I do not appreciate having such things
> said about me. Yes, FMAJ, I agree with you - their unprovoked and
> unfounded comments were insulting and uncalled for. Thanks for seeing the
> truth and not taking the side of your friends over that of truth (sarcasm
> intended)
>
Your attempts to misread my statement are duely noted.
> I notice that no one said a word to Susan for her unprovoked insults of me
> and the others? But when I - the outsider - returned the favor all hell
> broke loose. You people blindly follow your self-imposed double standards.
> Too bad you can't just face your opponents honestly - that you have to
> resort to underhanded tactics.
>
More uncalled for accusations. That you now call me dishonest and underhanded
is again something totally out of line and uncalled for.
Shame...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 04 2000 - 01:48:11 EDT