Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is)

From: Stephen E. Jones (sejones@iinet.net.au)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 18:06:09 EDT

  • Next message: Richard Wein: "Re: A Question of Abiogenesis #2"

    Reflectorites

    On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 04:50:06 +0100, Richard Wein wrote:

    RW>Oh dear, DNA, I once thought you were a cut above the average IDer.
    >Unfortunately, some of your recent posts, including this one, have shown
    >that you're just as illogical as the rest of them.

    Now I can add "illogical" to "irrational", "nonsense", and "absurd" to
    my `qualifications' bestowed by Richard!

    Why does the `un-dogmatic' Richard even *bother* with us poor,
    benighted IDers?

    Steve

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Stephen E. (Steve) Jones ,--_|\ Email: sejones@iinet.net.au
    3 Hawker Avenue / Oz \ Web: http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
    Warwick 6024 -> *_,--\_/ Phone: +61 8 9448 7439
    Perth, Western Australia v "Test everything." (1 Thess. 5:21)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 17 2000 - 18:14:21 EDT