Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent?

From: DNAunion@aol.com
Date: Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:28:07 EDT

  • Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: (non-flame post) good chess programs intelligent?"

    In a message dated 10/10/00 1:15:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
    ccogan@telepath.com writes:

    >>Ccoagn: The reason why I reject this evaluation of intelligence with
    respect to a
     pure "evolutionary algorithm" ...

    DNAunion: I was not offering chess computers as any kind of evolutionary
    algorithm of as a mechanism involved in the origin of life. My questions
    were whether or not we have "proof of principle" that intelligence is not
    confined to life as we know it, and if we have "proof of principle" of one
    form of intelligence creating another completely different kind.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 23:28:27 EDT