In a message dated 10/5/2000 7:18:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
ccogan@telepath.com writes:
> >
> >FMAJ1019@aol.com writes:
> >
> ><< What pathways have
> > been identified by ID? >>
>
> Huxter
> >And, in my opinion more importantly, HOW were these ID pathways/structures
> >identified?
>
> Chris
> And, at what point did ID enter into the development of whatever it is that
> is supposed to be the result of ID? Or was it all done in one act of
> genetic manipulation? Or *what*? Come on, ID-ers, let's at least have you
> cough up some testable hypotheses here.
It seems awefully quiet right now. Which seems to support my impression that
other than a "design inference", the ID movement has not (yet?) identified
the potential pathways.
Although...
"During the Q & A, Simon Conway Morris was the moderator. When my hand
went up he called on me. [I took this as evidence supporting the
hypothesis that he liked my question during his talk :-) --grm] I
asked Behe that he has spent a lot of time talking about what wouldn't
work and asked him to tell us what would work--if not evolution, what,
then? Miracles? Behe stumbled around a bit and finally said that God
inputs information into living system all along the way."
http://home.flash.net/~mortongr/wacoday2.htm
That's quite an interesting pathway. So how do we go about supporting this
pathway? Any predictions?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:00:06 EDT