evolution@calvin.edu by date

About this archive
Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Wed 01 Nov 1995 - 11:56:23 EST
Ending: Sun 31 Dec 1995 - 23:26:50 EST
Messages: 781

Re: Signing off Kevin Wirth
farewell Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Bill Hamilton
Correction: Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Terry M. Gray
Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
Re: Week 3 Stephen Jones
Re: pamphlet Part III Stephen Jones
Re: pamphlet Part III Stephen Jones
Re: Humans > Other ? Stephen Jones
Re: Humans > Other ? Stephen Jones
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Too much of a false thing GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
New listserv software Terry M. Gray
Re: Pamphlet Part V Brian D. Harper
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Pamphlet Part II response 3 Brian D. Harper
Re: Pamphlet Part IV GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's Area and the man with no brain GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: The Scientist as Map-maker Stephen Jones
Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Stephen Jones
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Stephen Jones
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Stephen Jones
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Genetic Similarity Jim Foley
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Pamphlet Part V John W. Burgeson
Pamphlet Part V John W. Burgeson
Test. Kyle VanderBeek
Test. Kyle VanderBeek
Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Terry M. Gray
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part V vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part IV vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part II response 3 vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: ICR Home Page (was Pamphlet part I) Stephen Jones
Re: Genetic Similarity Stephen Jones
Re: Pamphlet part I Stephen Jones
Re: Phil Johnson's debating style (was ICR) Stephen Jones
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Stephen Jones
week 4 John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Week 5 John W. Burgeson
Week 8 John W. Burgeson
Week 6 John W. Burgeson
Week 7 John W. Burgeson
Week 9 John W. Burgeson
Re: Whipping Glenn ;-) Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
diagram Glenn.Morton@ORYX.COM
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: oafishness Steve Clark
Re: Gish vs Ross #2 (was ICR) Stephen Jones
Re: Gish vs Ross #1 (was ICR) Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
oafishness A.E. Manier Sr.
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: EC v PC 1/2 (was It's the early bird that fits the bil Stephen Jones
Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Stephen Jones
Re: EC v PC 2/2 (was It's the early bird that fits the bil Stephen Jones
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Brian D. Harper
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Brian D. Harper
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
Re: free will/determinism and God's planning GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Cold Air From the North GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Cold Air From the North GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Jim Bell
muddleheadedness quotient Steve Clark
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Jim Bell
Re: Re:free will/determinism and God's planning Dave Probert
Re:free will/determinism and God's planning GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Jim Bell
Re: Survey Steve Clark
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Humans > Other ? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Merry Christmas folks Bill Hamilton
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Jim Bell
Design, evolution and imperfection arguments Bill Hamilton
Re: Humans > Other ? John W. Burgeson
Re: Humans > Other ? Bill Hamilton
Re: Survey Jim Foley
Re: Humans > Other ? John W. Burgeson
money, other abstractions => humans <> animals Bill Hamilton
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's Area GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Seismosaurus GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Molecular Adam and Eve GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Humans > Other ? GRMorton@aol.com
Survey II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Survey vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Seismosaurus John W. Burgeson
Re: Happy Christmas Stephen Jones
Re: PC and Biblical Theologians (was Time/Cambrian Explosi Stephen Jones
Pamphlet Part III response 2 vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: pamphlet Part III Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: Pamphlet Part III, 1st response Jim Foley
Re: Humans > Other ? Bill Hamilton
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Jim Foley
Molecular Adam and Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part III, 1st response vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Jim Foley
Re: Broca's Area Jim Foley
Re: science and the supernatural Steve Clark
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Bill Hamilton
Re: science and the supernatural Dave Probert
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: pamphlet Part III Jim Foley
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Humans > Other ? John W. Burgeson
Week 3 John W. Burgeson
Re: science and the supernatural Steve Clark
Re: science and the supernatural Steve Clark
Re: Where is the List Archive? Bill Hamilton
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Bill Hamilton
Re: Molecular Adam and Eve GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's Area GRMorton@aol.com
Where is the List Archive? Jim Foley
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
pamphlet Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
science and the supernatural Dave Probert
Pamphlet Part I Iteration 2 vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Molecular Adam and Eve vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Broca's Area vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Dennis L. Durst
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dave Probert
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Jim Bell
Week 2 John W. Burgeson
Re: eisegesis GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Denis Lamoureux
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Refutation? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Dave Probert
The Scientist as Map-maker John W. Burgeson
Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Stephen Jones
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Refutation? Jim Foley
Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Bill Hamilton
Refutation? vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Bill Hamilton
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Bill Hamilton
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Thomas L Moore
Re: Focus on the Family Gish/Ross debate Dennis L. Durst
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Jim Bell
Focus on the Family Gish/Ross debate Bill Hamilton
Week 1 of Phil Johnson's tour John W. Burgeson
Focus on the Family Gish-Ross discussion Bill Hamilton
Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Bill Hamilton
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Denis Lamoureux
Re: "evolution" antithetical? GRMorton@aol.com
How should Christians handle refutations? GRMorton@aol.com
Genetic Similarity Dennis L. Durst
Apologetic Value of PC/TE Dennis L. Durst
Re: Pamphlet part I Jim Foley
Re: Pamphlet part I Jim Foley
Re: ICR John W. Burgeson
Re: Comments on Phil Johnson seminar Stephen Jones
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Stephen Jones
Re: Pamphlet part I Stephen Jones
"evolution" antithetical? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Jim Foley
Alta Vista Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: ICR Bill Hamilton
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Bill Hamilton
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Denis Lamoureux
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Josh 10 Denis Lamoureux
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Denis Lamoureux
Self-Organization [was Re: It's the early bird ... Brian D. Harper
Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
Re: Human explosion (fwd) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: ICR Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosi Stephen Jones
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Stephen Jones
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Dave Probert
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Denis Lamoureux
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Denis Lamoureux
Animal ancestry of Adam's body Terry M. Gray
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 Stephen Jones
Re: Fwd: Chordates, Evolution and the flood Stephen Jones
Re: Cc: to groups Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Brian D. Harper
Time Off vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Reply to Ratzsch II GRMorton@aol.com
Reply to Ratzsch GRMorton@aol.com
Old art GRMorton@aol.com
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Pamphlet part I GRMorton@aol.com
Reply to Ratzsch II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Conspiracy Theory (was Time/Cambrian Explosion) Stephen Jones
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Dave Probert
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Jim Foley
Reply to Ratzsch vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Cc: to groups Terry M. Gray
Cc: to groups Terry M. Gray
Re: Pamphlet part I Jim Foley
Re: Human explosion (fwd) David J. Tyler
Re: Pamphlet Part II GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Pamphlet part I GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Denis Lamoureux
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Pamphlet part I GRMorton@aol.com
Comments on Phil Johnson seminar John W. Burgeson
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
reply to Burgy John W. Burgeson
Pamphlet part I vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Pamphlet Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Annotation to Outline vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Brian D. Harper
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: ICR Bill Hamilton
Re: De Novo Adam Bill Hamilton
Re: reply to Burgy Bill Hamilton
Re: De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Re: The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
reply to Burgy SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Brian D. Harper
Re: De Novo Adam Steve Clark
Re: De Novo Adam Bill Hamilton
Re: Robert Gentry Bill Hamilton
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Bill Hamilton
Re: ICR Bill Hamilton
Re: De Novo Adam Steve Clark
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: De Novo Adam Steve Clark
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Stephen Jones
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: De Novo Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Human Evolution Part II Part II Stephen Jones
De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Longgupo Habilis GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Denis Lamoureux
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Denis Lamoureux
Subject: Re: Chordates, Evolution and the flood GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Musings and Retractions GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Musings and Retractions Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Musings and Retractions Thomas L Moore
Musings and Retractions vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: flood models #1 GRMorton@aol.com
Re: human explosion GRMorton@aol.com
Re: flood models #1 GRMorton@aol.com
Re: human remains GRMorton@aol.com
Fwd: Chordates, Evolution and the flood GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Part III Thomas L Moore
The Cambrian Explosion GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Two Adam Model GRMorton@aol.com
Response to Weekend Posts GRMorton@aol.com
Time/Cambrian Explosion Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
human remains jimbeh@ms.uky.edu
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Part II Thomas L Moore
Time/Cambrian Explosion Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Human Evolution Part 4 (?) vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Stephen Jones
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Bill Hamilton
Re: Terry Gray Thomas L Moore
Mail problems Terry M. Gray
Terry Gray vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Jim Foley
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Jim Foley
Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion part II Thomas L Moore
Time/Cambrian Explosion part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Time/Cambrian Explosion vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Stephen Jones
Re: Human Evolution Part III Stephen Jones
Cut off in mid-thread GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's region & speech GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Human Evolution Part II Jim Foley
Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) Brian D. Harper
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Jim Foley
The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Jim Foley
Re: Testing the biotic message Jeffrey S. Kramer
Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
Re: Being A Good Christian :-) Denis Lamoureux
Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Foley
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
Re: Response to Weekend Posts Jim Foley
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Talking apes? That's a laugh, say scientists Gordon Simons
A couple questions for Walter John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Pandas debate John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: A question for TE's Bill Hamilton
New creation (was Re: A Question for TE's (fwd)) Bill Hamilton
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
Re: Creatio ex nihilo Denis Lamoureux
Re: The Cambrian Explosion Brian D. Harper
Creatio ex nihilo Russ Maatman
Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Walter ReMine
Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: burials Stephen Jones
Re: Pandas debate Stephen Jones
Re: The "two-Adam model" Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: Response to Weekend Posts Jim Foley
Re: De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Technical Difficulties vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Response to Weekend Posts vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
Post From Glenn M. Denis Lamoureux
Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Bell
Re: De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Re: De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Denis Lamoureux
De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
bounced again GRMorton@aol.com
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Denis Lamoureux
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Denis Lamoureux
Re: De Novo Adam (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: second law Denis Lamoureux
Re: De Novo Adam GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's region & speech GRMorton@aol.com
Re: De Novo Adam Denis Lamoureux
Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Bell
De Novo Adam Jim Bell
Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Bell
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
The Night Before Christmas John W. Burgeson
Re: Broca's region & speech, and Chinese GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Broca's region & speech GRMorton@aol.com
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
psychic phenomena Dave Probert
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Dennis L. Durst
Re: Broca's region & speech Jim Foley
Broca's region & speech Jim Bell
Re: Human Evolution Part II Part II Jim Foley
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Jim Foley
Re: Human Evolution Part III Jim Foley
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Bill Hamilton
Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Denis Lamoureux
Re: human activities GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Human Evolution Part III GRMorton@aol.com
2-adam, need Hebrew help. GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Human Evolution Part II GRMorton@aol.com
Re: A question for TE's GRMorton@aol.com
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Re: Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Stephen Jones
Re: human activities Stephen Jones
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Dave Probert
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Gentry Po halo work Bill Hamilton
Re: Science and supernatural causation (and schools) Bill Hamilton
Re: A question for TE's Denis Lamoureux
Human Evolution Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Human Evolution Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: Human Evolution Part III Steve Clark
Re: Human Evolution Part III Jim Foley
Re: Human Evolution Part II Jim Foley
The Night Before Christmas Steven Fawl
Human Evolution Part III vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Human Evolution Part II Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: A question for TE's Russ Maatman
Human Evolution Part II vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Jim Foley
Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) John P Turnbull
Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Human Evolution Jim Foley
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Steve Clark
Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
Re: Testing the biotic message Jeffrey S. Kramer
Re: Testing Darwinism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
The Cambrian Explosion John P Turnbull
Re: Human Evolution GRMorton@aol.com
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: A question for TE's GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Human Evolution vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Dave Probert
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Science and supernatural causation (and schools) Walter ReMine
Re: Testing the biotic message Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: A question for TE's lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Jim Foley
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Jim Foley
Probability, Statistics and Theology Bill Hamilton
Science and supernatural causation (and schools) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: A question for TE's Bill Hamilton
Re: HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA!!! Bill Hamilton
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Denis Lamoureux
archive address Terry M. Gray
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The "two-Adam model" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA!!! vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Dave Probert
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: The "two-Adam model" Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Re: burials GRMorton@aol.com
Re: A question for TE's Russ Maatman
Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
Re: A question for TE's Russ Maatman
Sangre de Cristo Thomas L Moore
Re: A question for TE's Dave Probert
Re: A question for TE's Russ Maatman
Re: A Question for TE's (fwd) Russ Maatman
bounced again Steve Clark
Re: A Question for TE's Russ Maatman
Re: The naked truth Stephen Jones
Re: simulations Stephen Jones
Re: burials Stephen Jones
Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
Re: The "game" of science Stephen Jones
Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
Re: recent posts Stephen Jones
I'm back BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Testing the biotic message Jeffrey S. Kramer
A question for TE's Russ Maatman
Re: Falsifiability Steve Clark
Re: Falsifiability Walter ReMine
Re: Testing the biotic message Walter ReMine
Re: Human explosion (corrected version) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Human explosion (fwd) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Falsifiability Steve Clark
Testing the biotic message Jeffrey S. Kramer
Pandas debate John W. Burgeson
Re: Supernatural John W. Burgeson
Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) John W. Burgeson
Testing the biotic message Walter ReMine
Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Supernatural Bill Hamilton
Re: Supernatural John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Bill Hamilton
Re: The Two-Model Approach Steve Clark
Re: Testing atomism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: human explosion GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Supernatural BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Falsifiability BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Testing atomism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Testing the "biotic message" lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Testing Darwinism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Falsifiability & Supernatural Bill Hamilton
Re: The Bible and Facts Stephen Jones
Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
Re: Supernatural Walter ReMine
Falsifiability & Supernatural Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism John W. Burgeson
The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) John W. Burgeson
Re: Supernatural Jim Foley
Supernatural Walter ReMine
Re: Falsifiability Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
Re: geocentrism chadwicka@swac.edu
Re: Human explosion (fwd) chadwicka@swac.edu
Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Bill Hamilton
Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: asdf Dave Probert
The nerve of mechanism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Supernatural (was The Two-Model Approach) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Falsifiability (was Testing Darwinism, part 2) Steve Clark
Re: The Two-Model Approach Walter ReMine
Unidentified subject! Dave Probert
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Human explosion (fwd) BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Falsifiability (was Testing Darwinism, part 2) Walter ReMine
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Human explosion (fwd) Stephen Jones
Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
Re: The Two-Model Approach GRMorton@aol.com
Mechanism vs. pantheism GRMorton@aol.com
Mechanism vs. pantheism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The Two-Model Approach Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
Re: Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) DONALD FRACK
Falsifiability JHOFMANN@CCVAX.FULLERTON.EDU
Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Clark
The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Walter ReMine
Testing the Biotic Message (was Testing Darwinism) Walter ReMine
Re: Testing atomism GRMorton@aol.com
Testing atomism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Clark
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Clark
"seeing" atoms GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Steve Clark
Re: "seeing" atoms Steve Clark
New version of hominids FAQ Jim Foley
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Walter ReMine
"seeing" atoms SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
Re: Testing Darwinism lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Testing Darwinism Dave Probert
Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
Re: Goodbye Troy Britain
Re: Goodbye DONALD FRACK
Re: Goodbye GRMorton@aol.com
Re: human activities GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Popper's recantation GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Testing Darwinism GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Additional points on evolution GRMorton@aol.com
Goodbye Gordon Simons
Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: Theological reasons for macroevolution (long) #5 Stephen Jones
Re: human activities Stephen Jones
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re: Testing Darwinism BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
Re:Popper's recantation Gordon Simons
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Steve Anonsen/GPS
Re:Popper's recantation Gordon Simons
Re:Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Walter ReMine
Re: Additional points on evolution Arthur V. Chadwick
Re:Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
Re: Testing Darwinism Steve Clark
Re: Additional points on evolution Steve Clark
New hominid discovery GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Additional points on evolution Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Additional points on evolution GRMorton@aol.com
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Kevin Wirth
Re: Testing Darwinism Walter ReMine
Re: Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: Re:Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Jim Foley
Re: Re:Popper's recantation Bill Hamilton
Re:Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
Re: Additional points on evolution Arthur V. Chadwick
[Fwd: So long for now] Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
Re: Additional points on evolution GRMorton@aol.com
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
Homeotic genes Terry M. Gray
Re: evolution@calvin.edu GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Homeotic genes Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Homeotic genes Steve Clark
Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Stephen Jones
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Comments on conservation of regulatory elements Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Additional points on evolution Arthur V. Chadwick
Re:Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
Additional points on evolution Terry M. Gray
Re: Popper's recantation Terry M. Gray
Re: Popper's recantation John P Turnbull
Re: evolution@calvin.edu John W. Burgeson
Homeotic genes Arthur V. Chadwick
Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) Walter ReMine
Re: Popper's recantation lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: human activities lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: TE/PC intervention/guidance lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
List problems Terry M. Gray
Re: Popper's recantation DONALD FRACK
Re: Self-organization Terry M. Gray
Re: Self-organization Terry M. Gray
Pearce's Who is Adam? GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The "two-Adam model" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The "two-Adam model" GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Are we getting somewhere? Stephen Jones
Re: Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
Re: Theological reasons for macroevolution (long) #4 Stephen Jones
Re: The "two-Adam model" (was flood models #3) Stephen Jones
Re: The "two-Adam model" (was flood models #3) Stephen Jones
Re: Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
Mess up. GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Hominids and hard evidence GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Hominids and hard evidence GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Some literature suggestions re NS, etc. Bill Davis
Self-Organization Bill Davis
Some literature suggestions re NS, etc. John W. Burgeson
Re: Hominids and hard evidence Jim Bell
Re: human activities Jim Bell
Re: Hominids and hard evidence Jim Foley
Re: Popper's recantation Walter ReMine
The naked truth Gordon Simons
Science, truth, risks John W. Burgeson
Self-Organization [was: Re: Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
Re: Hominids and hard evidence GRMorton@aol.com
Re: human activities Jim Foley
Hominids and hard evidence Jim Bell
Re: burials Jim Bell
Re: Popper's recantation John W. Burgeson
Science, truth, risks David J. Tyler
Re: simulations Bill Hamilton
burials GRMorton@aol.com
Re: simulations GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances GRMorton@aol.com
Re: The "game" of science lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
simulations lhaarsma@opal.tufts.edu
Re: human activities Jim Bell
A hope for the future jGibson
Re: human activities Jim Foley
Re: Popper recantation Bill Hamilton
Re: Infamous quotes Jim Bell
Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances Jim Bell
Re: Popper's recantation Brian D. Harper
Re: The Bible and Facts David J. Tyler
Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances GRMorton@aol.com
Re: fossil man and body paint GRMorton@AOL.com
Infamous quotes Brian D. Harper
Re: Human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
[BATTSON@id.ucsb.edu: Stasis and Agnostic Science] John W. Burgeson
Art as evidence of humanity John W. Burgeson
[BATTSON@id.ucsb.edu: Stasis and Agnostic Science] Dave Probert
Re: Theology re: Revelation Stephen Jones
Re: Darwinism's impact Stephen Jones
Re: The Bible and Facts Stephen Jones
Re: Darwinism's impact Gordon Simons
Re: Darwinism's impact Stephen Jones
Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances Jim Bell
Re: fossil man and body paint Bill Hamilton
fossil man and body paint GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Human explosion (fwd) David J. Tyler
Re: Darwinism's impact Gordon Simons
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again)] Stephen Jones
Re: Darwinism's impact Stephen Jones
Re: Flatland (was human explosion (fwd)) Stephen Jones
Re: Popper's recantation Stephen Jones
The humble burin:source of spirituality GRMorton@aol.com
Re: TE/PC intervention/guidance Stephen Jones
Re: NYT article on abiogenesis Stephen Jones
Atheism of the Gaps John P Turnbull
Re: apologetics John W. Burgeson
Re: Popper's "Recantation" Brian D. Harper
Re: apologetics michael farley
Re: apologetics GRMorton@aol.com
Re: human explosion GRMorton@aol.com
apologetics Robert Pyne
Atheism of the Gaps Troy Britain
Re: human explosion (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Popper's "Recantation" (was Geocentrism and other issu Stephen Jones
Re: human activities Jim Bell
Re: Intervention and other issues Stephen Jones
Re: apologetics Dave Probert
Re: human explosion Stephen Jones
Re: apologetics Jim Bell
Re: apologetics Jim Bell
Re: Atheism of the Gaps Jim Foley
apologetics Robert Pyne
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: Atheism of the Gaps Steve Clark
apologetics Bill Hamilton
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Bill Hamilton
Re: The "game" of science GRMorton@aol.com
human activities GRMorton@aol.com
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) GRMorton@aol.com
Re: Atheism of the Gaps Gordon Simons
Re: apologetics Dave Probert
Re: Atheism of the Gaps Dave Probert
The "game" of science John W. Burgeson
Re: human explosion (fwd) John W. Burgeson
Re: Atheism of the Gaps Steve Anonsen/GPS
Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Stephen Jones
Re: Two-"Adam" model (was flood models #1...) Stephen Jones
Re: Atheism of the Gaps Steve Clark
Atheism of the Gaps Jim Bell
Re: apologetics Jim Bell

Last message date: Sun 31 Dec 1995 - 23:26:50 EST
Archived on: Mon Jan 01 1996 - 21:27:31 EST

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.