>What fascinated me was that the first possible evidence for art, body
>painting, may have occurred with Homo habilis. If this was the case (I admit
>this is not proof) then Hugh Ross' view that art is evidence of man's
>spiritual awareness is wrong.
>
Or -- what is a better alternative under your scenario -- Hugh Ross' view
that the spiritual awareness he associates with art appeared only 50k years
ago or so is incorrect. If the thesis of your book is correct, spiritual
awareness -- still perhaps evidenced by art -- appeared much earlier.
Bill Hamilton | Vehicle Systems Research
GM R&D Center | Warren, MI 48090-9055
810 986 1474 (voice) | 810 986 3003 (FAX)
hamilton@gmr.com (office) | whamilto@mich.com (home)