evolution@calvin.edu by author

• About this archive
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Wed 01 Nov 1995 - 11:56:23 EST
Ending: Sun 31 Dec 1995 - 23:26:50 EST
Messages: 781

• A.E. Manier Sr.
  • oafishness Wed, 27 Dec 1995 12:26:34 -0600
• Arthur V. Chadwick
  • Alta Vista Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:45:19 -0800
  • Re: Musings and Retractions Fri, 08 Dec 1995 15:05:20 -0800
  • Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:34:06 -0800
  • Re: Human explosion (corrected version) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 22:37:53 -0800
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:55:45 -0800
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:47:35 -0800
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 09:06:32 -0800
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 17:55:59 -0800
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 19 Nov 1995 18:11:16 -0800
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Thu, 16 Nov 1995 09:46:21 -0800
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Wed, 15 Nov 1995 22:20:01 -0800
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Wed, 15 Nov 1995 21:09:59 -0800
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Wed, 15 Nov 1995 10:27:18 -0800
  • Re: Homeotic genes Tue, 14 Nov 1995 19:56:44 -0800
  • Comments on conservation of regulatory elements Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:01:34 -0800
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:16:15 -0800
  • Homeotic genes Tue, 14 Nov 1995 00:20:04 -0800
• BHendrsn@kirk.microsys.net
  • I'm back Thu, 23 Nov 1995 13:25:18 +0000
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 11:15:42 +0000
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 11:15:40 +0000
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 18:08:30 +0000
  • Re: Supernatural Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:49:18 +0000
  • Re: Falsifiability Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:49:13 +0000
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:49:16 +0000
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:49:24 +0000
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 02:05:59 +0000
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 19 Nov 1995 15:38:45 +0000
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Sat, 18 Nov 1995 00:30:41 +0000
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Thu, 16 Nov 1995 13:15:52 +0000
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 13:15:54 +0000
• Bill Davis
  • Re: Some literature suggestions re NS, etc. Fri, 10 Nov 1995 16:42:46 -0600 (CST)
  • Self-Organization Fri, 10 Nov 1995 16:28:45 -0600 (CST)
• Bill Hamilton
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sun, 31 Dec 1995 17:27:10 -0500
  • Correction: Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Sun, 31 Dec 1995 17:27:05 -0500
  • Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Sun, 31 Dec 1995 09:11:49 -0500
  • Re: Noll & Creationism (fwd) Sun, 31 Dec 1995 07:11:45 -0500
  • Merry Christmas folks Fri, 22 Dec 1995 14:38:06 -0500
  • Design, evolution and imperfection arguments Fri, 22 Dec 1995 13:18:54 -0500
  • Re: Humans > Other ? Fri, 22 Dec 1995 11:56:19 -0500
  • money, other abstractions => humans <> animals Fri, 22 Dec 1995 08:33:01 -0500
  • Re: Humans > Other ? Thu, 21 Dec 1995 16:16:33 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:16:03 -0500
  • Re: Where is the List Archive? Thu, 21 Dec 1995 09:00:10 -0500
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Thu, 21 Dec 1995 08:42:17 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Tue, 19 Dec 1995 16:37:23 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 15:20:24 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 15:15:15 -0500
  • Focus on the Family Gish/Ross debate Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:17:09 -0500
  • Focus on the Family Gish-Ross discussion Tue, 19 Dec 1995 09:03:50 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 08:42:46 -0500
  • Re: ICR Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:33:56 -0500
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Mon, 18 Dec 1995 09:42:26 -0500
  • Re: ICR Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:51:16 -0500
  • Re: reply to Burgy Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:27:26 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Mon, 11 Dec 1995 15:41:01 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:44:03 -0500
  • Re: Robert Gentry Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:02:40 -0500
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Mon, 11 Dec 1995 09:53:13 -0500
  • Re: ICR Mon, 11 Dec 1995 09:28:35 -0500
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Thu, 7 Dec 1995 17:22:50 -0500
  • Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) Wed, 6 Dec 1995 15:08:14 -0500
  • New creation (was Re: A Question for TE's (fwd)) Tue, 5 Dec 1995 12:02:57 -0500
  • Re: A question for TE's Tue, 5 Dec 1995 12:10:22 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Tue, 5 Dec 1995 07:28:20 -0500
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 1 Dec 1995 08:51:11 -0500
  • Re: Science and supernatural causation (and schools) Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:02:06 -0500
  • Gentry Po halo work Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:06:30 -0500
  • Probability, Statistics and Theology Mon, 27 Nov 1995 12:41:06 -0500
  • Re: A question for TE's Mon, 27 Nov 1995 14:20:53 -0500
  • Re: HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA!!! Mon, 27 Nov 1995 09:36:01 -0500
  • Re: Supernatural Tue, 21 Nov 1995 11:53:16 -0500
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:32:18 -0500
  • Re: Falsifiability & Supernatural Mon, 20 Nov 1995 17:02:54 -0500
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 09:34:55 -0500
  • Re: Re:Popper's recantation Wed, 15 Nov 1995 13:43:44 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Wed, 15 Nov 1995 09:53:04 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Wed, 15 Nov 1995 08:12:29 -0500
  • Re: simulations Thu, 9 Nov 1995 09:54:44 -0500
  • Re: Popper recantation Wed, 8 Nov 1995 12:12:24 -0500
  • Re: fossil man and body paint Tue, 7 Nov 1995 08:34:56 -0500
  • Re: human explosion (fwd) Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:33:55 -0500
  • apologetics Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:08:52 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Thu, 2 Nov 1995 07:38:40 -0500
• Brian D. Harper
  • Re: Pamphlet Part V Fri, 29 Dec 1995 23:31:54 -0500
  • Re: Pamphlet Part II response 3 Fri, 29 Dec 1995 22:49:31 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:15:39 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:15:39 -0500
  • Self-Organization [was Re: It's the early bird ... Sun, 17 Dec 1995 01:28:52 -0500
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:30:04 -0500
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Mon, 11 Dec 1995 21:01:18 -0500
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Mon, 11 Dec 1995 12:39:04 -0500
  • Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) Wed, 6 Dec 1995 13:05:12 -0500
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Mon, 4 Dec 1995 23:31:25 -0500
  • Re:Popper's recantation Thu, 16 Nov 1995 09:57:09 -0500
  • Re:Popper's recantation Tue, 14 Nov 1995 11:27:21 -0500
  • Re: Popper's recantation Sat, 11 Nov 1995 21:59:36 -0500
  • Self-Organization [was: Re: Popper's recantation Thu, 9 Nov 1995 23:04:58 -0500
  • Re: Popper's recantation Wed, 8 Nov 1995 10:42:38 -0500
  • Infamous quotes Tue, 7 Nov 1995 23:57:01 -0500
  • Re: Popper's "Recantation" Fri, 3 Nov 1995 20:45:33 -0500
• chadwicka@swac.edu
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 20 Nov 1995 11:04:46 +0000
  • Re: geocentrism Mon, 20 Nov 1995 11:04:46 +0000
• Dave Probert
  • farewell Mon, 1 Jan 1996 00:26:06 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Mon, 1 Jan 1996 00:20:48 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Mon, 1 Jan 1996 00:09:21 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sun, 31 Dec 1995 05:07:54 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sun, 31 Dec 1995 05:02:51 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 30 Dec 1995 21:46:43 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 30 Dec 1995 18:56:39 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 30 Dec 1995 02:37:44 GMT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Fri, 29 Dec 1995 21:25:13 GMT
  • Re: Whipping Glenn ;-) Thu, 28 Dec 1995 14:06:48 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 28 Dec 1995 13:36:15 -0800
  • Re: Re:free will/determinism and God's planning Sun, 24 Dec 1995 12:18:35 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 23 Dec 1995 23:11:15 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Fri, 22 Dec 1995 13:52:18 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 21:17:36 -0800
  • Re: pamphlet Part III Thu, 21 Dec 1995 17:35:55 EST5EDT
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:02:39 -0800
  • Re: science and the supernatural Thu, 21 Dec 1995 10:30:03 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 10:16:09 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 09:41:07 -0800
  • science and the supernatural Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:07:48 -0800
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Wed, 20 Dec 1995 09:38:43 -0800
  • Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Tue, 19 Dec 1995 16:15:54 -0800
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Sat, 16 Dec 1995 13:49:51 -0800
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:54:48 -0800
  • psychic phenomena Fri, 1 Dec 1995 16:05:00 -0800
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:02:36 -0800
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:02:47 -0800
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Sun, 26 Nov 1995 15:24:48 -0800
  • Re: A question for TE's Sat, 25 Nov 1995 14:42:08 -0800
  • Re: A question for TE's Sat, 25 Nov 1995 14:37:15 -0800
  • Re: A question for TE's Sat, 25 Nov 1995 14:03:03 -0800
  • Re: A question for TE's Fri, 24 Nov 1995 20:26:10 -0800
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Mon, 20 Nov 1995 09:45:27 -0800
  • Re: asdf Sun, 19 Nov 1995 22:08:03 -0800
  • Unidentified subject! Sun, 19 Nov 1995 17:05:22 -0800
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Sat, 18 Nov 1995 23:41:14 -0800
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Sat, 18 Nov 1995 20:02:04 -0800
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Sat, 18 Nov 1995 18:43:25 -0800
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Fri, 17 Nov 1995 10:18:48 -0800
  • [BATTSON@id.ucsb.edu: Stasis and Agnostic Science] Tue, 7 Nov 1995 15:19:44 -0800
  • Re: apologetics Thu, 2 Nov 1995 18:17:06 -0800
  • Re: apologetics Wed, 1 Nov 1995 11:32:03 -0800
  • Re: Atheism of the Gaps Wed, 1 Nov 1995 11:59:09 -0800
• David J. Tyler
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 12 Dec 1995 16:50:17 GMT
  • Science, truth, risks Thu, 9 Nov 1995 15:04:42 GMT
  • Re: The Bible and Facts Wed, 8 Nov 1995 10:23:57 GMT
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 6 Nov 1995 11:46:35 GMT
• Denis Lamoureux
  • Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Tue, 19 Dec 1995 21:36:59 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:03:15 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 16 Dec 1995 22:10:13 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 16 Dec 1995 19:26:15 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Josh 10 Sat, 16 Dec 1995 23:25:48 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Sat, 16 Dec 1995 23:14:41 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:34:35 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Thu, 14 Dec 1995 16:33:16 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Fri, 15 Dec 1995 23:47:13 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Fri, 15 Dec 1995 22:41:26 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:46:16 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Sat, 9 Dec 1995 00:34:05 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Sat, 9 Dec 1995 00:06:12 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Mon, 4 Dec 1995 23:09:37 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam Tue, 5 Dec 1995 20:25:48 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:54:53 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 1 Dec 1995 17:11:18 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: second law Sat, 2 Dec 1995 15:06:54 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 2 Dec 1995 14:52:05 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Sat, 2 Dec 1995 09:47:11 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 3 Dec 1995 08:43:16 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Sat, 2 Dec 1995 22:35:38 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Sat, 2 Dec 1995 16:33:41 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Sat, 2 Dec 1995 15:49:00 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 3 Dec 1995 21:03:32 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Being A Good Christian :-) Tue, 5 Dec 1995 19:36:01 -0700 (MST)
  • Post From Glenn M. Sun, 3 Dec 1995 21:15:40 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: A question for TE's Wed, 29 Nov 1995 20:54:24 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Mon, 27 Nov 1995 01:00:44 -0700 (MST)
• Dennis L. Durst
  • Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:35:41 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: Focus on the Family Gish/Ross debate Tue, 19 Dec 1995 10:49:30 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 1 Dec 1995 17:44:52 -0600 (CST)
  • Genetic Similarity Mon, 18 Dec 1995 20:40:08 -0600 (CST)
  • Apologetic Value of PC/TE Mon, 18 Dec 1995 20:32:57 -0600 (CST)
• DONALD FRACK
  • Re: Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) 19 Nov 95 01:53:41 EST
  • Re: Goodbye 16 Nov 95 23:04:14 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation 13 Nov 95 03:12:29 EST
• Glenn.Morton@ORYX.COM
  • diagram Thu 28 Dec 1995 07:23 CT
• Gordon Simons
  • Talking apes? That's a laugh, say scientists Tue, 5 Dec 1995 14:26:06 -0500 (EST)
  • Goodbye Thu, 16 Nov 1995 20:26:49 -0500 (EST)
  • Re:Popper's recantation Thu, 16 Nov 1995 14:11:11 -0500 (EST)
  • Re:Popper's recantation Thu, 16 Nov 1995 12:53:59 -0500 (EST)
  • The naked truth Fri, 10 Nov 1995 12:22:58 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Darwinism's impact Tue, 7 Nov 1995 18:47:59 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Darwinism's impact Sun, 5 Nov 1995 21:29:46 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Atheism of the Gaps Wed, 1 Nov 1995 21:30:11 -0500 (EST)
• GRMorton@aol.com
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sun, 31 Dec 1995 14:27:00 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 30 Dec 1995 17:36:39 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 30 Dec 1995 16:09:11 -0500
  • Too much of a false thing Sat, 30 Dec 1995 15:45:31 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Fri, 29 Dec 1995 23:20:29 -0500
  • Re: Pamphlet Part IV Fri, 29 Dec 1995 22:10:37 -0500
  • Re: Broca's Area and the man with no brain Fri, 29 Dec 1995 22:10:34 -0500
  • Apologetic Value of PC/TE Fri, 29 Dec 1995 07:41:12 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 28 Dec 1995 23:40:12 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 28 Dec 1995 23:39:57 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 28 Dec 1995 22:23:57 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 28 Dec 1995 00:37:00 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Wed, 27 Dec 1995 22:15:01 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Wed, 27 Dec 1995 22:14:53 -0500
  • Re: free will/determinism and God's planning Tue, 26 Dec 1995 08:55:49 -0500
  • Re: Cold Air From the North Tue, 26 Dec 1995 07:03:43 -0500
  • Re: Cold Air From the North Tue, 26 Dec 1995 07:03:43 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Mon, 25 Dec 1995 12:53:59 -0500
  • Re:free will/determinism and God's planning Sun, 24 Dec 1995 14:39:45 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sun, 24 Dec 1995 09:27:18 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 24 Dec 1995 01:21:48 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Sat, 23 Dec 1995 22:15:23 -0500
  • Re: Humans > Other ? Fri, 22 Dec 1995 16:35:57 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Fri, 22 Dec 1995 16:03:24 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Fri, 22 Dec 1995 16:03:25 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Fri, 22 Dec 1995 07:42:46 -0500
  • Re: Broca's Area Fri, 22 Dec 1995 07:03:26 -0500
  • Re: Seismosaurus Thu, 21 Dec 1995 23:18:10 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 22:40:57 -0500
  • Re: Molecular Adam and Eve Thu, 21 Dec 1995 22:41:10 -0500
  • Re: Humans > Other ? Thu, 21 Dec 1995 22:40:36 -0500
  • Re: Molecular Adam and Eve Thu, 21 Dec 1995 03:43:53 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 21 Dec 1995 03:10:35 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Thu, 21 Dec 1995 02:55:34 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:22:43 -0500
  • Re: Broca's Area Wed, 20 Dec 1995 23:05:00 -0500
  • Re: eisegesis Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:29:14 -0500
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:50:51 -0500
  • Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:34:20 -0500
  • Re: Refutation? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:26:06 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:26:03 -0500
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:25:28 -0500
  • Re: "evolution" antithetical? Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:41:30 -0500
  • How should Christians handle refutations? Mon, 18 Dec 1995 23:33:56 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 17 Dec 1995 09:17:34 -0500
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sat, 16 Dec 1995 21:28:53 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 16 Dec 1995 21:28:53 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 16 Dec 1995 21:28:54 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Thu, 14 Dec 1995 19:13:20 -0500
  • Reply to Ratzsch II Wed, 13 Dec 1995 9:44:05 EST5EDT
  • Reply to Ratzsch Wed, 13 Dec 1995 9:36:58 EST5EDT
  • Old art Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:17:52 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Tue, 12 Dec 1995 22:56:37 -0500
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Tue, 12 Dec 1995 22:53:40 -0500
  • Re: Pamphlet Part II Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:45:44 EST5EDT
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Tue, 12 Dec 1995 10:36:20 EST5EDT
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Tue, 12 Dec 1995 01:18:17 -0500
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:52:32 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Mon, 11 Dec 1995 19:52:10 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 10 Dec 1995 21:43:14 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 10 Dec 1995 18:57:59 -0500
  • Longgupo Habilis Sat, 9 Dec 1995 23:35:25 -0500
  • Subject: Re: Chordates, Evolution and the flood Fri, 8 Dec 1995 23:15:01 -0500
  • Re: Musings and Retractions Fri, 8 Dec 1995 18:44:52 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 Fri, 8 Dec 1995 03:36:18 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 Fri, 8 Dec 1995 03:36:18 -0500
  • Re: human explosion Fri, 8 Dec 1995 03:44:43 -0500
  • Re: human remains Fri, 8 Dec 1995 02:11:03 -0500
  • Fwd: Chordates, Evolution and the flood Fri, 8 Dec 1995 01:19:29 -0500
  • The Cambrian Explosion Fri, 8 Dec 1995 00:11:44 -0500
  • Re: Two Adam Model Fri, 8 Dec 1995 00:11:17 -0500
  • Response to Weekend Posts Thu, 7 Dec 1995 23:55:18 -0500
  • Cut off in mid-thread Wed, 6 Dec 1995 16:17:45 -0500
  • Re: Broca's region & speech Wed, 6 Dec 1995 15:58:41 -0500
  • De Novo Adam Sun, 3 Dec 1995 09:01:24 -0500
  • De Novo Adam Sun, 3 Dec 1995 09:01:24 -0500
  • De Novo Adam Sat, 2 Dec 1995 23:16:08 -0500
  • bounced again Sat, 2 Dec 1995 22:42:51 -0500
  • Re: Broca's region & speech Sat, 2 Dec 1995 17:24:39 -0500
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 2 Dec 1995 17:24:42 -0500
  • Re: Broca's region & speech, and Chinese Fri, 1 Dec 1995 22:18:34 -0500
  • Re: Broca's region & speech Fri, 1 Dec 1995 22:18:33 -0500
  • Re: human activities Thu, 30 Nov 1995 23:28:11 -0500
  • Re: Human Evolution Part III Thu, 30 Nov 1995 23:28:02 -0500
  • 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Thu, 30 Nov 1995 23:24:33 -0500
  • Re: A question for TE's Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:25:01 -0500
  • Re: Human Evolution Part II Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:25:18 -0500
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 23:18:46 -0500
  • Re: Human Evolution Tue, 28 Nov 1995 23:18:56 -0500
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:14:35 -0500
  • Re: A question for TE's Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:33:34 -0500
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" Sun, 26 Nov 1995 21:05:27 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Sun, 26 Nov 1995 21:05:38 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Sun, 26 Nov 1995 21:05:28 -0500
  • Re: burials Sat, 25 Nov 1995 22:33:16 -0500
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 21 Nov 1995 21:31:01 -0500
  • Re: Testing atomism Mon, 20 Nov 1995 21:46:16 -0500
  • Re: human explosion Mon, 20 Nov 1995 21:46:14 -0500
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Mon, 20 Nov 1995 21:42:59 -0500
  • Re: Supernatural (was The Two-Model Approach) Sun, 19 Nov 1995 22:33:13 -0500
  • The nerve of mechanism Sun, 19 Nov 1995 22:33:15 -0500
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach Sun, 19 Nov 1995 16:34:45 -0500
  • Mechanism vs. pantheism Sun, 19 Nov 1995 16:34:48 -0500
  • Mechanism vs. pantheism Sun, 19 Nov 1995 16:34:48 -0500
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Sat, 18 Nov 1995 22:19:00 -0500
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Sat, 18 Nov 1995 22:06:34 -0500
  • Re: Testing atomism Sat, 18 Nov 1995 12:39:44 -0500
  • "seeing" atoms Fri, 17 Nov 1995 19:29:30 -0500
  • Re: human activities Thu, 16 Nov 1995 22:32:20 -0500
  • Re: Goodbye Thu, 16 Nov 1995 22:32:22 -0500
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Thu, 16 Nov 1995 20:51:50 -0500
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 20:52:06 -0500
  • Re: Popper's recantation Thu, 16 Nov 1995 20:52:17 -0500
  • New hominid discovery Thu, 16 Nov 1995 07:33:21 -0500
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Wed, 15 Nov 1995 22:50:32 -0500
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Tue, 14 Nov 1995 23:52:57 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Tue, 14 Nov 1995 23:47:20 -0500
  • Re: evolution@calvin.edu Tue, 14 Nov 1995 21:01:09 -0500
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" Sun, 12 Nov 1995 22:09:35 -0500
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" Sun, 12 Nov 1995 22:09:35 -0500
  • Pearce's Who is Adam? Sun, 12 Nov 1995 22:09:46 -0500
  • Mess up. Fri, 10 Nov 1995 23:25:17 -0500
  • Re: Hominids and hard evidence Fri, 10 Nov 1995 19:19:23 -0500
  • Re: Hominids and hard evidence Fri, 10 Nov 1995 19:19:36 -0500
  • Re: Hominids and hard evidence Thu, 9 Nov 1995 22:38:28 -0500
  • burials Thu, 9 Nov 1995 07:24:08 -0500
  • Re: simulations Wed, 8 Nov 1995 23:19:12 -0500
  • Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances Wed, 8 Nov 1995 23:18:33 -0500
  • Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:04:18 -0500
  • Re: fossil man and body paint Wed, 8 Nov 1995 00:03:47 -0500
  • fossil man and body paint Mon, 6 Nov 1995 23:53:02 -0500
  • The humble burin:source of spirituality Sun, 5 Nov 1995 17:46:33 -0500
  • Re: apologetics Fri, 3 Nov 1995 06:59:19 -0500
  • Re: human explosion Fri, 3 Nov 1995 06:58:54 -0500
  • Re: The "game" of science Thu, 2 Nov 1995 00:39:01 -0500
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Wed, 1 Nov 1995 23:50:38 -0500
  • human activities Wed, 1 Nov 1995 23:50:53 -0500
• Jeffrey S. Kramer
  • Re: Testing the biotic message 05 Dec 95 22:15:05 EST
  • Re: Testing the biotic message 29 Nov 95 10:37:41 EST
  • Re: Testing the biotic message 23 Nov 95 13:49:46 EST
  • Testing the biotic message 21 Nov 95 20:37:27 EST
• jGibson
  • A hope for the future Wed, 08 Nov 95 12:19:51 PST
• JHOFMANN@CCVAX.FULLERTON.EDU
  • Falsifiability Sat, 18 Nov 1995 21:34:30 -0800 (PST)
• Jim Bell
  • Re: Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) 31 Dec 95 16:43:31 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 31 Dec 95 16:43:21 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 31 Dec 95 16:42:59 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 30 Dec 95 19:43:00 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 30 Dec 95 19:42:37 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 30 Dec 95 15:29:41 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 30 Dec 95 15:29:24 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 29 Dec 95 19:57:16 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 29 Dec 95 12:18:29 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 29 Dec 95 12:18:18 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 28 Dec 95 11:28:21 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 26 Dec 95 16:42:28 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 26 Dec 95 12:04:28 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE 25 Dec 95 14:21:53 EST
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? 24 Dec 95 16:07:41 EST
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? 23 Dec 95 13:53:55 EST
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? 22 Dec 95 13:07:51 EST
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? 20 Dec 95 11:45:25 EST
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? 19 Dec 95 11:57:04 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam 14 Dec 95 09:58:03 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam 12 Dec 95 12:17:53 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam 11 Dec 95 15:02:39 EST
  • De Novo Adam 10 Dec 95 15:41:52 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam 04 Dec 95 14:32:35 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam 03 Dec 95 16:42:09 EST
  • Re: Broca's region & speech 03 Dec 95 16:42:02 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam 03 Dec 95 16:41:57 EST
  • Re: Broca's region & speech 02 Dec 95 14:47:15 EST
  • De Novo Adam 02 Dec 95 14:47:38 EST
  • Re: Broca's region & speech 02 Dec 95 14:47:22 EST
  • Broca's region & speech 01 Dec 95 14:48:20 EST
  • Re: Hominids and hard evidence 10 Nov 95 14:51:24 EST
  • Re: human activities 10 Nov 95 14:51:15 EST
  • Hominids and hard evidence 09 Nov 95 16:47:01 EST
  • Re: burials 09 Nov 95 11:54:34 EST
  • Re: human activities 08 Nov 95 18:12:30 EST
  • Re: Infamous quotes 08 Nov 95 11:55:19 EST
  • Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances 08 Nov 95 11:55:34 EST
  • Re: Body paint, art, and sudden appearances 07 Nov 95 13:24:18 EST
  • Re: human activities 02 Nov 95 12:40:47 EST
  • Re: apologetics 02 Nov 95 12:40:10 EST
  • Re: apologetics 02 Nov 95 12:40:25 EST
  • Re: apologetics 01 Nov 95 11:54:23 EST
  • Atheism of the Gaps 01 Nov 95 11:54:39 EST
• Jim Foley
  • Re: Genetic Similarity Fri, 29 Dec 95 13:45:35 MST
  • Re: Survey Fri, 22 Dec 95 09:16:51 MST
  • Re: Pamphlet Part III, 1st response Thu, 21 Dec 95 14:17:01 MST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Thu, 21 Dec 95 14:04:46 MST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Thu, 21 Dec 95 13:36:49 MST
  • Re: Broca's Area Thu, 21 Dec 95 13:16:50 MST
  • Re: pamphlet Part III Thu, 21 Dec 95 11:11:57 MST
  • Where is the List Archive? Wed, 20 Dec 95 16:52:20 MST
  • Re: Refutation? Tue, 19 Dec 95 15:28:09 MST
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Mon, 18 Dec 95 16:37:00 MST
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Mon, 18 Dec 95 16:37:00 MST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Mon, 18 Dec 95 13:25:39 MST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Tue, 12 Dec 95 12:43:51 MST
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Tue, 12 Dec 95 10:02:46 MST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Thu, 7 Dec 95 13:00:22 MST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Thu, 7 Dec 95 11:36:48 MST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part II Wed, 6 Dec 95 12:48:32 MST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Wed, 6 Dec 95 11:28:13 MST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Wed, 6 Dec 95 10:03:09 MST
  • Re: Broca's region & speech Tue, 5 Dec 95 16:18:53 MST
  • Re: Response to Weekend Posts Tue, 5 Dec 95 12:52:40 MST
  • Re: Response to Weekend Posts Mon, 4 Dec 95 12:48:41 MST
  • Re: Broca's region & speech Fri, 1 Dec 95 14:42:24 MST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part II Part II Fri, 1 Dec 95 11:49:27 MST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part III Fri, 1 Dec 95 10:32:18 MST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Fri, 1 Dec 95 11:37:59 MST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part III Wed, 29 Nov 95 17:14:42 MST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part II Wed, 29 Nov 95 17:00:00 MST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Wed, 29 Nov 95 13:25:47 MST
  • Re: Human Evolution Wed, 29 Nov 95 12:05:09 MST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Mon, 27 Nov 95 12:45:05 MST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Mon, 27 Nov 95 12:58:39 MST
  • Re: Supernatural Mon, 20 Nov 95 12:35:47 MST
  • New version of hominids FAQ Fri, 17 Nov 95 14:17:07 MST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Wed, 15 Nov 95 13:36:21 MST
  • Re: Hominids and hard evidence Fri, 10 Nov 95 11:46:55 MST
  • Re: human activities Thu, 9 Nov 95 13:04:50 MST
  • Re: human activities Wed, 8 Nov 95 13:12:52 MST
  • Re: Atheism of the Gaps Thu, 2 Nov 95 12:09:42 MST
• jimbeh@ms.uky.edu
  • human remains Thu, 7 Dec 1995 19:46:50 -0500 (EST)
• John W. Burgeson
  • Pamphlet Part V 29 Dec 95 11:54:15 EST
  • Pamphlet Part V 29 Dec 95 11:54:16 EST
  • Week 6 28 Dec 95 19:17:18 EST
  • Week 8 28 Dec 95 19:16:50 EST
  • week 4 28 Dec 95 19:17:52 EST
  • Week 9 28 Dec 95 19:16:38 EST
  • Week 7 28 Dec 95 19:16:55 EST
  • Week 5 28 Dec 95 19:17:33 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 28 Dec 95 19:17:56 EST
  • Re: Humans > Other ? 22 Dec 95 12:32:33 EST
  • Re: Humans > Other ? 22 Dec 95 10:14:29 EST
  • Seismosaurus 21 Dec 95 20:18:08 EST
  • Humans > Other ? 21 Dec 95 11:01:31 EST
  • Week 3 21 Dec 95 11:01:25 EST
  • Week 2 20 Dec 95 09:38:02 EST
  • The Scientist as Map-maker 19 Dec 95 17:37:38 EST
  • Week 1 of Phil Johnson's tour 19 Dec 95 10:55:55 EST
  • Re: ICR 18 Dec 95 18:23:53 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 17 Dec 95 23:15:29 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 14 Dec 95 14:45:52 EST
  • Comments on Phil Johnson seminar 11 Dec 95 19:48:23 EST
  • reply to Burgy 11 Dec 95 20:16:18 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 11 Dec 95 20:16:15 EST
  • Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosion (fwd) 11 Dec 95 12:53:22 EST
  • A couple questions for Walter Tue, 5 Dec 1995 13:00:03 EST5EDT
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 05 Dec 95 12:01:32 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 05 Dec 95 12:01:28 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 05 Dec 95 12:01:27 EST
  • Re: Pandas debate 05 Dec 95 12:01:25 EST
  • The Night Before Christmas 02 Dec 95 09:24:27 EST
  • Pandas debate 21 Nov 95 19:52:59 EST
  • Re: Supernatural 21 Nov 95 19:53:07 EST
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) 21 Nov 95 19:53:04 EST
  • Re: Supernatural 21 Nov 95 10:50:34 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 20 Nov 95 18:40:14 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 20 Nov 95 18:40:18 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 20 Nov 95 18:40:24 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 20 Nov 95 18:40:24 EST
  • The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) 20 Nov 95 14:43:14 EST
  • Re: Testing Darwinism 20 Nov 95 14:43:49 EST
  • Re: evolution@calvin.edu 14 Nov 95 09:58:13 EST
  • Some literature suggestions re NS, etc. 10 Nov 95 15:39:49 EST
  • Science, truth, risks 10 Nov 95 10:05:47 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation 09 Nov 95 11:38:10 EST
  • [BATTSON@id.ucsb.edu: Stasis and Agnostic Science] 07 Nov 95 19:41:03 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) 07 Nov 95 19:31:28 EST
  • Art as evidence of humanity 07 Nov 95 19:31:17 EST
  • Re: apologetics 04 Nov 95 11:52:43 EST
  • Re: human explosion (fwd) 01 Nov 95 18:37:20 EST
  • The "game" of science 01 Nov 95 18:37:01 EST
• John P Turnbull
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Wed, 20 Dec 95 13:43:06 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Mon, 11 Dec 95 13:51:08 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Thu, 7 Dec 95 13:55:36 EST
  • The Cambrian Explosion Wed, 6 Dec 95 12:37:24 EST
  • Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) Wed, 29 Nov 95 15:51:53 EST
  • The Cambrian Explosion Wed, 29 Nov 95 9:37:18 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation Tue, 14 Nov 95 10:03:13 EST
  • Atheism of the Gaps Sat, 4 Nov 95 18:00:11 EST
• Kevin Wirth
  • Re: Signing off Sun, 31 Dec 95 20:26:48 PST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Wed, 15 Nov 95 18:45:09 PST
• Kyle VanderBeek
  • Test. Fri, 29 Dec 1995 11:27:46 -0500 (EST)
  • Test. Fri, 29 Dec 1995 11:27:46 -0500 (EST)
• lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
  • "evolution" antithetical? Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:01:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Thu, 07 Dec 1995 14:42:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) Wed, 29 Nov 1995 15:23:17 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Wed, 29 Nov 1995 10:21:32 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Wed, 29 Nov 1995 10:22:21 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: A question for TE's Mon, 27 Nov 1995 21:10:42 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: The "game" of science (MN and ID) Mon, 27 Nov 1995 21:08:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Science and supernatural causation (and schools) Mon, 27 Nov 1995 21:09:50 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Mon, 20 Nov 1995 17:05:48 -0500 (EST)
  • Testing the "biotic message" Mon, 20 Nov 1995 17:06:40 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Testing atomism Mon, 20 Nov 1995 17:07:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Testing atomism Sat, 18 Nov 1995 11:12:17 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Fri, 17 Nov 1995 14:17:21 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) Wed, 15 Nov 1995 17:02:46 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: human activities Mon, 13 Nov 1995 15:17:45 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Popper's recantation Mon, 13 Nov 1995 15:19:36 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: TE/PC intervention/guidance Mon, 13 Nov 1995 15:15:07 -0500 (EST)
  • simulations Wed, 08 Nov 1995 20:44:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: The "game" of science Wed, 08 Nov 1995 20:45:30 -0500 (EST)
• michael farley
  • Re: apologetics Fri, 3 Nov 1995 08:49:08 -0500 (EST)
• Robert Pyne
  • apologetics Thu, 2 Nov 95 23:36:26 CST
  • apologetics Thu, 2 Nov 95 16:42:54 CST
• Russ Maatman
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 5 Dec 1995 13:40:24 -0600 (CST)
  • Creatio ex nihilo Mon, 4 Dec 1995 21:00:20 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: De Novo Adam (fwd) Sat, 2 Dec 1995 16:53:05 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Thu, 30 Nov 1995 14:27:26 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Thu, 30 Nov 1995 09:47:55 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's Wed, 29 Nov 1995 16:43:03 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 12:08:07 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:26:12 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:09:19 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:32:13 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's (fwd) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:18:42 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's Sat, 25 Nov 1995 20:42:34 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's Sat, 25 Nov 1995 11:38:58 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A question for TE's Fri, 24 Nov 1995 22:15:24 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A Question for TE's (fwd) Fri, 24 Nov 1995 19:18:21 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: A Question for TE's Fri, 24 Nov 1995 10:52:30 -0600 (CST)
  • A question for TE's Thu, 23 Nov 1995 11:45:47 -0600 (CST)
• Stephen Jones
  • Re: Gould vs Dawkins (was The Cambrian Explosion) Sat, 30 Dec 95 18:52:20 EST
  • Re: Week 3 Sat, 30 Dec 95 20:46:50 EST
  • Re: pamphlet Part III Sat, 30 Dec 95 21:59:25 EST
  • Re: pamphlet Part III Sat, 30 Dec 95 19:39:37 EST
  • Re: Humans > Other ? Sun, 31 Dec 95 07:39:24 EST
  • Re: Humans > Other ? Sun, 31 Dec 95 07:39:24 EST
  • Re: The Scientist as Map-maker Sat, 30 Dec 95 08:55:17 EST
  • Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Fri, 29 Dec 95 21:55:30 EST
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Fri, 29 Dec 95 15:37:51 EST
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Fri, 29 Dec 95 19:27:15 EST
  • Re: ICR Home Page (was Pamphlet part I) Fri, 29 Dec 95 09:36:18 EST
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Thu, 28 Dec 95 17:25:56 EST
  • Re: Genetic Similarity Thu, 28 Dec 95 17:48:23 EST
  • Re: Phil Johnson's debating style (was ICR) Thu, 28 Dec 95 16:40:28 EST
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Thu, 28 Dec 95 18:30:32 EST
  • Re: Gish vs Ross #2 (was ICR) Wed, 27 Dec 95 19:46:38 EST
  • Re: Gish vs Ross #1 (was ICR) Wed, 27 Dec 95 19:44:01 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Wed, 27 Dec 95 23:25:29 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam Wed, 27 Dec 95 13:29:35 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Wed, 27 Dec 95 22:50:32 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Wed, 27 Dec 95 21:55:51 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Thu, 28 Dec 95 07:46:08 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 23 Dec 95 09:52:46 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sat, 23 Dec 95 13:46:36 EST
  • Re: EC v PC 1/2 (was It's the early bird that fits the bil Sun, 24 Dec 95 11:45:15 EST
  • Re: In the beginning? (was Josh 10) Mon, 25 Dec 95 08:23:21 EST
  • Re: EC v PC 2/2 (was It's the early bird that fits the bil Sun, 24 Dec 95 11:45:25 EST
  • Re: Happy Christmas Fri, 22 Dec 95 07:16:42 EST
  • Re: PC and Biblical Theologians (was Time/Cambrian Explosi Fri, 22 Dec 95 07:14:48 EST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Thu, 21 Dec 95 06:07:41 EST
  • Re: Sarah's "seminal emission" (was Creatio ex nihilo) Wed, 20 Dec 95 06:27:00 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Wed, 20 Dec 95 06:44:24 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam Wed, 20 Dec 95 06:35:21 EST
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Mon, 18 Dec 95 22:26:03 EST
  • Re: Comments on Phil Johnson seminar Sun, 17 Dec 95 08:51:04 EST
  • Re: Pamphlet part I Mon, 18 Dec 95 21:35:06 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 16 Dec 95 21:48:02 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Sat, 16 Dec 95 06:56:03 EST
  • Re: Limitations of Science and TE's [was Re: Human explosi Sat, 16 Dec 95 20:37:10 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sat, 16 Dec 95 08:06:53 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sat, 16 Dec 95 23:15:00 EST
  • Re: ICR Sat, 16 Dec 95 08:43:55 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Sat, 16 Dec 95 21:15:18 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Sat, 16 Dec 95 23:42:19 EST
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Fri, 15 Dec 95 06:44:13 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 Thu, 14 Dec 95 06:32:09 EST
  • Re: Cc: to groups Thu, 14 Dec 95 06:42:25 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Wed, 13 Dec 95 23:33:29 EST
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Thu, 14 Dec 95 05:49:29 EST
  • Re: Fwd: Chordates, Evolution and the flood Thu, 14 Dec 95 06:29:11 EST
  • Re: Conspiracy Theory (was Time/Cambrian Explosion) Wed, 13 Dec 95 07:24:08 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Tue, 12 Dec 95 06:43:48 EST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Tue, 12 Dec 95 06:38:09 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Tue, 12 Dec 95 05:44:29 EST
  • Re: Creatio ex nihilo Mon, 11 Dec 95 22:40:11 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Tue, 12 Dec 95 06:08:46 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill (long) Sun, 10 Dec 95 23:04:18 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Sat, 09 Dec 95 09:58:07 EST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part II Part II Sun, 10 Dec 95 14:41:22 EST
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Sun, 10 Dec 95 19:06:01 EST
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 10 Dec 95 20:08:06 EST
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Sun, 10 Dec 95 17:18:42 EST
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 08 Dec 95 06:18:32 EST
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 08 Dec 95 06:51:41 EST
  • Re: 2-adam, need Hebrew help. Fri, 08 Dec 95 07:07:32 EST
  • Re: The Cambrian Explosion Thu, 07 Dec 95 06:33:01 EST
  • Re: Human Evolution Part III Thu, 07 Dec 95 06:47:07 EST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Wed, 06 Dec 95 06:09:39 EST
  • Re: human explosion Mon, 04 Dec 95 21:18:23 EST
  • Re: Pandas debate Mon, 04 Dec 95 21:36:57 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Tue, 05 Dec 95 06:20:59 EST
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" Tue, 05 Dec 95 06:23:01 EST
  • Re: burials Mon, 04 Dec 95 21:52:57 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Mon, 04 Dec 95 23:09:10 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 03 Dec 95 22:30:36 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 03 Dec 95 22:00:00 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 03 Dec 95 22:42:52 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 03 Dec 95 22:48:26 EST
  • Re: Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Fri, 01 Dec 95 06:18:58 EST
  • Re: human activities Thu, 30 Nov 95 22:44:13 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Thu, 30 Nov 95 21:34:10 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Wed, 29 Nov 95 06:34:42 EST
  • Re: Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) Wed, 29 Nov 95 05:50:05 EST
  • Re: Africa's Eve is found to be an Adam Sun, 26 Nov 95 22:27:10 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Sun, 26 Nov 95 23:12:40 EST
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" Sun, 26 Nov 95 20:42:24 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Mon, 27 Nov 95 06:02:39 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Mon, 27 Nov 95 06:43:52 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Sun, 26 Nov 95 23:22:58 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation Thu, 23 Nov 95 21:32:22 EST
  • Re: The naked truth Thu, 23 Nov 95 23:12:04 EST
  • Re: burials Thu, 23 Nov 95 22:32:10 EST
  • Re: recent posts Fri, 24 Nov 95 06:38:42 EST
  • Re: simulations Thu, 23 Nov 95 21:52:04 EST
  • Re: The "game" of science Thu, 23 Nov 95 22:01:00 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation Thu, 23 Nov 95 22:46:40 EST
  • Re: human explosion Sun, 19 Nov 95 20:00:34 EST
  • Re: The Bible and Facts Mon, 20 Nov 95 06:00:47 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation Sun, 19 Nov 95 22:55:09 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Sun, 19 Nov 95 22:15:26 EST
  • Re: Human explosion (fwd) Mon, 20 Nov 95 05:30:35 EST
  • Re: Theological reasons for macroevolution (long) #5 Thu, 16 Nov 95 07:09:39 EST
  • Re: human activities Fri, 17 Nov 95 06:02:30 EST
  • [Fwd: So long for now] Wed, 15 Nov 95 23:55:55 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Wed, 15 Nov 95 06:57:01 EST
  • Re: It's the early bird that fits the bill Mon, 13 Nov 95 23:16:44 EST
  • Re: Are we getting somewhere? Mon, 13 Nov 95 06:21:50 EST
  • Re: human explosion Sun, 12 Nov 95 08:46:13 EST
  • Re: Theological reasons for macroevolution (long) #4 Sun, 12 Nov 95 20:33:05 EST
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" (was flood models #3) Sat, 11 Nov 95 23:40:10 EST
  • Re: The "two-Adam model" (was flood models #3) Sat, 11 Nov 95 23:40:10 EST
  • Re: Theology re: Revelation Tue, 07 Nov 95 22:03:39 EST
  • Re: Darwinism's impact Tue, 07 Nov 95 21:24:16 EST
  • Re: The Bible and Facts Tue, 07 Nov 95 23:04:51 EST
  • Re: Darwinism's impact Wed, 08 Nov 95 06:32:13 EST
  • Re: TE/PC intervention/guidance Mon, 06 Nov 95 06:45:03 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again)] Mon, 06 Nov 95 07:08:33 EST
  • Re: Darwinism's impact Sat, 04 Nov 95 08:10:41 EST
  • Re: NYT article on abiogenesis Sat, 04 Nov 95 06:06:41 EST
  • Re: Popper's recantation Sat, 04 Nov 95 06:52:39 EST
  • Re: Flatland (was human explosion (fwd)) Sun, 05 Nov 95 20:49:58 EST
  • Re: Popper's "Recantation" (was Geocentrism and other issu Fri, 03 Nov 95 06:16:23 EST
  • Re: Intervention and other issues Fri, 03 Nov 95 06:40:24 EST
  • Re: human explosion Fri, 03 Nov 95 05:40:44 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Fri, 03 Nov 95 07:13:52 EST
  • Re: flood models #1 (was Fossil Man Again) Thu, 02 Nov 95 07:09:56 EST
  • Re: Two-"Adam" model (was flood models #1...) Thu, 02 Nov 95 06:18:03 EST
• Steve Anonsen/GPS
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 16 Nov 95 10:09:34 EDT
  • Re: Atheism of the Gaps 1 Nov 95 17:25:59 EDT
• Steve Clark
  • Re: oafishness Wed, 27 Dec 1995 18:59:06 -0600
  • muddleheadedness quotient Mon, 25 Dec 1995 12:56:29 -0600
  • Re: Survey Fri, 22 Dec 1995 19:56:33 -0600
  • Re: science and the supernatural Thu, 21 Dec 1995 13:44:24 -0600
  • Re: science and the supernatural Thu, 21 Dec 1995 10:05:00 -0600
  • Re: science and the supernatural Thu, 21 Dec 1995 10:05:00 -0600
  • Re: De Novo Adam Mon, 11 Dec 1995 10:52:48 -0600
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 10 Dec 1995 19:07:23 -0600
  • Re: De Novo Adam Sun, 10 Dec 1995 20:08:48 -0600
  • Re: Human Evolution Part III Wed, 29 Nov 1995 19:01:54 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Wed, 29 Nov 1995 10:23:46 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Wed, 29 Nov 1995 10:29:24 -0600
  • bounced again Fri, 24 Nov 1995 12:37:29 -0600
  • Re: Falsifiability Wed, 22 Nov 1995 19:50:00 -0600
  • Re: Falsifiability Tue, 21 Nov 1995 19:59:40 -0600
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach Mon, 20 Nov 1995 22:23:01 -0600
  • Re: Falsifiability (was Testing Darwinism, part 2) Sun, 19 Nov 1995 20:00:46 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Sun, 19 Nov 1995 15:38:00 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Sat, 18 Nov 1995 20:11:15 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Fri, 17 Nov 1995 23:42:52 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Fri, 17 Nov 1995 18:31:24 -0600
  • Re: Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Fri, 17 Nov 1995 18:27:03 -0600
  • Re: "seeing" atoms Fri, 17 Nov 1995 18:08:58 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Fri, 17 Nov 1995 10:20:36 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 18:34:57 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 07:34:23 -0600
  • Re: Additional points on evolution Thu, 16 Nov 1995 07:14:51 -0600
  • Re: Homeotic genes Tue, 14 Nov 1995 18:37:56 -0600
  • Re: Atheism of the Gaps Thu, 2 Nov 1995 18:29:42 -0600
  • Re: Atheism of the Gaps Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:57:31 -0600
• Steven Fawl
  • The Night Before Christmas Wed, 29 Nov 95 15:50:06 -0800
• SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
  • reply to Burgy Sun, 10 Dec 1995 12:47:02 -0600 (CST)
  • "seeing" atoms Fri, 17 Nov 1995 13:36:22 -0600 (CST)
• Terry M. Gray
  • Nature of Scripture (was Apologetic Value of PC/TE) Sun, 31 Dec 1995 13:11:42 +0100
  • New listserv software Sat, 30 Dec 1995 11:38:49 +0100
  • Re: Apologetic Value of PC/TE Fri, 29 Dec 1995 02:49:38 +0100
  • Animal ancestry of Adam's body Fri, 15 Dec 1995 09:51:48 -0400
  • Cc: to groups Tue, 12 Dec 1995 12:17:51 -0400
  • Cc: to groups Tue, 12 Dec 1995 12:17:51 -0400
  • Mail problems Thu, 7 Dec 1995 16:55:45 -0400
  • archive address Mon, 27 Nov 95 01:28:16 0300
  • Homeotic genes Tue, 14 Nov 1995 22:41:35 -0400
  • Additional points on evolution Tue, 14 Nov 1995 11:22:46 -0400
  • Re: Popper's recantation Tue, 14 Nov 1995 11:19:44 -0400
  • List problems Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:12:16 -0400
  • Re: Self-organization Sun, 12 Nov 1995 22:29:29 -0400
  • Re: Self-organization Sun, 12 Nov 1995 22:29:29 -0400
• Thomas L Moore
  • Re: Musings and Retractions Fri, 8 Dec 1995 10:42:39 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Part III Thu, 7 Dec 1995 22:37:05 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion Part II Thu, 7 Dec 1995 20:31:43 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Terry Gray Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:14:42 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Time/Cambrian Explosion part II Thu, 7 Dec 1995 09:32:30 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: How should Christians handle refutations? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 12:16:10 -0700 (MST)
  • Sangre de Cristo Fri, 24 Nov 1995 22:50:35 -0700 (MST)
• Troy Britain
  • Re: Goodbye 17 Nov 95 03:41:19 EST
  • Atheism of the Gaps 02 Nov 95 21:48:38 EST
• vandewat@seas.ucla.edu
  • Broca's Area Thu, 28 Dec 1995 22:27:16 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part V Thu, 28 Dec 1995 21:59:34 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part II response 3 Thu, 28 Dec 1995 21:52:08 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part IV Thu, 28 Dec 1995 21:56:55 -0800 (PST)
  • Survey II Thu, 21 Dec 1995 17:51:56 -0800 (PST)
  • Survey Thu, 21 Dec 1995 17:43:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part III response 2 Thu, 21 Dec 1995 14:33:50 -0800 (PST)
  • Molecular Adam and Eve Thu, 21 Dec 1995 13:00:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part III, 1st response Thu, 21 Dec 1995 12:53:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Broca's Area Wed, 20 Dec 1995 22:17:22 -0800 (PST)
  • Broca's Area Wed, 20 Dec 1995 22:17:22 -0800 (PST)
  • pamphlet Part III Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:16:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part I Iteration 2 Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:05:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Molecular Adam and Eve Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:04:36 -0800 (PST)
  • Broca's Area Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:02:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Refutation? Tue, 19 Dec 1995 12:46:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Time Off Wed, 13 Dec 1995 10:46:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Reply to Ratzsch II Tue, 12 Dec 1995 19:18:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Reply to Ratzsch Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:26:54 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet part I Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:24:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Annotation to Outline Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:18:07 -0800 (PST)
  • Pamphlet Part II Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:24:35 -0800 (PST)
  • Musings and Retractions Fri, 8 Dec 1995 08:54:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Time/Cambrian Explosion Part III Thu, 7 Dec 1995 20:43:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Time/Cambrian Explosion Part II Thu, 7 Dec 1995 16:58:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Part 4 (?) Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:41:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Terry Gray Thu, 7 Dec 1995 12:39:50 -0800 (PST)
  • Time/Cambrian Explosion part II Wed, 6 Dec 1995 21:41:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Time/Cambrian Explosion Wed, 6 Dec 1995 16:41:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Technical Difficulties Mon, 4 Dec 1995 08:57:16 -0800 (PST)
  • Response to Weekend Posts Mon, 4 Dec 1995 07:40:53 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Part II Wed, 29 Nov 1995 17:26:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Part III Wed, 29 Nov 1995 17:17:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Part III Wed, 29 Nov 1995 15:33:14 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Part II Part II Wed, 29 Nov 1995 15:19:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Part II Wed, 29 Nov 1995 14:05:32 -0800 (PST)
  • Human Evolution Tue, 28 Nov 1995 13:02:37 -0800 (PST)
  • HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA, HOW ARE YA!!! Sun, 26 Nov 1995 15:39:03 -0800 (PST)
• Walter ReMine
  • Re: Testing Darwinism (denouement) Mon, 04 Dec 1995 17:41:10 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Wed, 29 Nov 1995 12:38:35 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Wed, 29 Nov 1995 12:36:56 -0600
  • Re: Science and supernatural causation (and schools) Tue, 28 Nov 1995 03:52:47 -0600
  • Re: Testing the biotic message Tue, 28 Nov 1995 03:00:46 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Tue, 28 Nov 1995 02:47:35 -0600
  • Re: Falsifiability Wed, 22 Nov 1995 17:33:12 -0600
  • Re: Testing the biotic message Wed, 22 Nov 1995 09:54:16 -0600
  • Testing the biotic message Tue, 21 Nov 1995 17:29:30 -0600
  • Re: Supernatural Mon, 20 Nov 1995 14:49:35 -0600
  • Falsifiability & Supernatural Mon, 20 Nov 1995 14:17:31 -0600
  • Re: Falsifiability Mon, 20 Nov 1995 13:07:32 -0600
  • Supernatural Mon, 20 Nov 1995 13:11:56 -0600
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach Sun, 19 Nov 1995 19:22:18 -0600
  • Falsifiability (was Testing Darwinism, part 2) Sun, 19 Nov 1995 16:16:04 -0600
  • Re: The Two-Model Approach Sun, 19 Nov 1995 14:23:06 -0600
  • The Two-Model Approach (was Testing the Biotic Message) Sat, 18 Nov 1995 16:40:47 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Sat, 18 Nov 1995 16:16:22 -0600
  • Testing the Biotic Message (was Testing Darwinism) Sat, 18 Nov 1995 14:57:54 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Fri, 17 Nov 1995 14:42:59 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Fri, 17 Nov 1995 14:15:56 -0600
  • Writing style, Magic, and Conspiracy Theories Fri, 17 Nov 1995 13:48:33 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 17:20:19 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 17:27:29 EST5EDT
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Thu, 16 Nov 1995 14:29:36 -0600
  • Re:Popper's recantation Thu, 16 Nov 1995 10:41:02 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism, part 2 Thu, 16 Nov 1995 10:05:59 -0600
  • Re: Testing Darwinism Wed, 15 Nov 1995 19:16:07 -0600
  • Re: Re:Popper's recantation Wed, 15 Nov 1995 15:09:07 -0600
  • Re:Popper's recantation Wed, 15 Nov 1995 11:14:16 -0600
  • Testing Darwinism (was: Popper's recantation) Mon, 13 Nov 1995 21:15:23 -0600
  • Re: Popper's recantation Sun, 12 Nov 1995 15:50:40 -0600
  • Re: Popper's recantation Fri, 10 Nov 1995 11:22:02 -0600

Last message date: Sun 31 Dec 1995 - 23:26:50 EST
Archived on: Mon Jan 01 1996 - 21:27:32 EST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives