No, Walter, if you'd bother actually reading what gets written
instead of spending all your time telling people what they really
meant to say, you might learn something.
> >What Loren was suggesting is that if we
> >observed a single species originating at several locations
> >simultaneously without any evident evolutionary pathways, we would
> >have to assume that evolution was false. You've blown it completely
> >out of all reasonable proportion.
>
> Brian gave a pseudo-test of evolution. I couldn't ask for a better example.
> Let me interpret Brian in plain English. He is claiming that one way to
> falsify Darwinism would be to DEMONSTRATE SOME OTHER METHOD OF EVOLUTION.
> Evolutionists would not be dismayed at this result. They'd be overjoyed!
Please don't bother "interpreting" me, since obviously you haven't
the slightest clue what I was saying. Loren made a perfectly valid
statement. You have perverted it out of all proportion. I tried to
correct your obvious misconceptions. Again, you ignored the message
in favor of your own ridiculous conclusions. I must therefore
conclude that you have no interest in the truth about evolution, just
in your own misrepresentation thereof.
> There is no test of evolution here. Just the usual run-around.
Yeah. Now if you'd just stop running, you might learn something.
-Brian