On Sun, 5 Nov 1995 21:29:46 -0500 (EST) you wrote:
>I concede that Stephen Jones is correct: He did say TE's were "being
>basically negative to Phil Johnson," and did not assert, as I said, "to
>Phil Johnson's view that philosophical naturalism is wrong."
>
>I did and still do believe this is a reasonable inference based on what
>Phil has said: "Ironically, while my critique of Darwinism and scientific
>naturalism has gained a hearing in secular academic debates, it has met
>with surprising resistance from theistic evolutionists in the Christian
>academic world."
>
>Also, I continue to believe that some TE's are smarting under the
>impression that Phil Johnson too closely identifies their TE position with
>an atheistic position on naturalism. Despite this, I don't believe (as
>Stephen's statement above suggests - to me at least), that TE's harbor
>some sort of personal hostility toward Phil Johnson.
I made no statement (explicit or implied) that "TE's harbor some sort
of
personal hostility toward Phil Johnson."
God bless.
Stephen
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Jones | ,--_|\ | sjones@iinet.net.au |
| 3 Hawker Ave | / Oz \ | sjones@odyssey.apana.org.au |
| Warwick 6024 |->*_,--\_/ | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sjones/ |
| Perth, Australia | v | phone +61 9 448 7439 |
----------------------------------------------------------------