I understand the argument that the 'sons of God' were men, but based
on identification of their offspring with genetic `monsters', and the
amount of convolution necessary to produce the doctrine of separation
that you espouse, I don't agree.
Also, I think it requires a misreading of Jude to decide that the
angels did not commit `gross immorality'.
But even so, all I was trying to establish was that there was reason
to believe that my interpretation might be correct, rather than convince
anybody that it *is* correct.
What you had written to me was:
> Dave--surely you do not actually believe that, besides Christ and our
> first parents, there were actually human births involving spirits?
> Of course, we've all heard of some pretty weird postulations in this
> matter. But I didn't expect to hear this from you!
By the grace of God,
--Dave