>>No set of data can be explained by only one theory. You wish
>>to have data that do not follow this rule ...
Steve mis-represented me. I did not mention any such rule. (And I think
Steve's word "rule" is a somewhat misleading wording, Del's "principle of
under-determination" is a better description.) I did not wish or require
any rule to be broken. Steve's point was a mis-representation of me.
-- Walter