Re: Testing Darwinism

GRMorton@aol.com
Thu, 16 Nov 1995 20:52:06 -0500

Steve Clark wrote:
>>Back to the Walter's positivism, the requirement for natural selection to
be immediately observable is similar to the positivism of Comte and his ilk
who disbelieve atomic theory because no one has ever seen an atom. <<

Just an odd fact here. Pictures of atoms have been in existence from at least
1967. In my old textbook, Russell Wehr and James Richards, _Physics of the
Atom_, Addison Wesley, 1967, p. 188, is a picture of the atoms in marcasite,
FeS2. It is a black and white photo (color photos are meaningless for this
scale) and clearly shows the larger iron and smaller sulfur atoms. I don't
know who Comte is, but since at least 1967, he has had the evidence to
disprove his position.

glenn