>The reason I ask this is because I don't believe it will be mentioned, much
>less given the prominence such counter information should be given in light
>of the influence of the particular organization involved. I am making this
>prediction about the future use or lack there of based upon past experience
>with Christian organizations. I have seen this happen many times, data which
>supports our position given prominent display and refutations not mentioned.
>
>Assuming that I am ultimately correct in my prediction, several questions can
>be asked. Is this the ethical thing to do? What does this look like to
>non-believers? Why do we fail to be straightforward with our problems?
>
>Any takers on my bet?
>
I believe I have seen retractions and corrections in Facts and Faith in the
past. They don't seem to have the "we are infallible complex" ICR and
other young-earth creationist organizations are prone to.
Bill Hamilton | Vehicle Systems Research
GM R&D Center | Warren, MI 48090-9055
810 986 1474 (voice) | 810 986 3003 (FAX)
hamilton@gmr.com (office) | whamilto@mich.com (home)