Walter responds:
> Jim has taken my meaning in a way I did not intend. The creation/evolution
> debate does turn, often enough, on the 'definition of science'. In the
> past, that thrust was driven most by anti-creationists, as a way to quickly
> defeat creation as "unscientific by definition."
Ok, Walter, I'll bite. I challenge creationists to defend
creationism *RATIONALLY*. Try it without having to resort to "it
must have been a miracle" to get you out of every jam.
You've been challenged, Walter. Do you accept?
-Brian