On Sun, 26 Nov 1995 21:05:27 -0500 Glenn wrote:
>Stephen Jones wrote:
>I am pleased that Glenn seems to accept that the two-"Adam" model is
>at least a possible explanation. I would expect to see Glenn
>mentioning this as a possibility in his future posts arguing for an ancient
>Adam.<<
>
>No Stephen I did not accept the 2-adam model as a possible explanation. I
>find only one piece of evidence in its favor and much against it. The Golan
>Venus was found under a tuff deposit which was dated at 230,000 years old and
>above one that appears to date at 400,000 years old. This implies that the
>Venus is between 230 and 330,000 years old. That does not fit in your model.
[...]
I have decided not to debate Glenn on the Reflector any more. :-(
God bless.
Stephen
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Jones | ,--_|\ | sjones@iinet.net.au |
| 3 Hawker Ave | / Oz \ | sjones@odyssey.apana.org.au |
| Warwick 6024 |->*_,--\_/ | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sjones/ |
| Perth, Australia | v | phone +61 9 448 7439 |
----------------------------------------------------------------