De Novo Adam
GRMorton@aol.com
Sat, 2 Dec 1995 23:16:08 -0500Russ Maatman was kind enough to forward me his posts. But unfortunately, I
saw absolutely no reasoning which would explain why he thought my view
violated his de novo requirement. If God is needed to be involved, God is
involved in Adam's creation in my view. If Eve needs to be taken from Adam's
rib, in my view, she is.
I may be dense, Russ, but I really do not see the reasoning you used to say
my view violated a de novo creation of Adam. This is especially puzzling to
me in light of what I learned in the definitions of de novo.
I know you are busy with your math class, but if you have a few minutes, I
sure would like to know what the objection is, specifically.
glenn