You wrote:
>>Glenn omitted a fourth possibility that any scientist would have to agree
with, namely: 4. some other explanation that Glenn has not thought of yet.
Some of us are operating on that assumption, and are attempting to develop
such a model.<<
Agreed, but it is difficult to construct an apologetic from what has not been
thought of yet. And there is the fifth possibility that in the future some
discovery will change what we believe, but it is equally difficult to
construct explanations from what has not been discovered yet.
God placed us in the latter half of the twentieth century. I see a major
implication in His choice of when to give life to me. He obviously has no
confidence in my capability in handling 22nd century ideas, concepts,
theories and data. Thus He must want me to deal with what I find in the 20th
century not what will be in the 22nd. And for better or worse, I will
attempt to deal with this century's ideas.
glenn