Re: A question for TE's

GRMorton@aol.com
Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:25:01 -0500

Russ Maatman wrote:
>>
Concerning the de novo matter: Glenn, we have been through this before.
Beginning in January of 1995, we went through some long threads on
the question. Some of my views were given on January 27, February 2, February
10, twice on February 23, and February 25. If you, Glenn, or anyone else
wants to see them, I can easily forward them.<<

Sorry, but my memory has a half life of about 4 months. I do not remember
being involved in that series of threads as I recall mostely being occupied
at that time by Mike Behe and Paul Nelson. Since there are a lot of people
on the reflector who were not here in January, it might be interesting if you
re-answered the question. I really don't remember the a de novo creation
coming out of your excellent book because you didn't cover the interpretation
of Genesis in the way I am proposing handling it.

If it isn't too much trouble to post your reasoning for de novo creation, I
would appreciate it. But if you don't want to, then please forward those
posts to me.

glenn