Evolution - November 2000
By Author

Starting: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 00:48:09 EST
Ending: Thu Nov 30 2000 - 20:09:53 EST

• AutismUK@aol.com
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #5 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 29 2000 - 06:10:07 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #4 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 29 2000 - 06:10:00 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #3 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 02:47:36 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #2 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 02:47:25 EST)
  • Re: Vague appeals to OST Parts 1-6 (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 04:25:41 EST)
  • Re: Vague appeals to OST (retraction - kind of) (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 02:52:27 EST)
  • Vague appeals to OST Parts 1-6 (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 02:26:14 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 15:37:34 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 12:31:47 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 12:31:37 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #1 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 05:52:23 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 17:23:01 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 04:25:49 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 04:25:48 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 04:25:46 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 11:20:55 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 16:30:03 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 15:52:12 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 05:39:05 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 05:39:02 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 19:02:41 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 19:02:38 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 04:49:43 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 04:49:45 EST)
  • Re: Dembski's `The Design Inference' peer reviewed? (was Examples of natural ... (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 05:46:47 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 05:59:26 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 05:59:25 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 05:59:24 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 04:41:25 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 04:41:23 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 05:24:32 EST)
• Bertvan@aol.com
  • Chance and Selection (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 08:04:52 EST)
  • Chance and Selection (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 10:15:04 EST)
  • Chance and Selection (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 09:38:06 EST)
  • Chance and Selection (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 13:19:49 EST)
  • chance and selection (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 18:54:53 EST)
  • chance and selection (Sun Nov 19 2000 - 11:56:59 EST)
  • chance and selection (Sun Nov 19 2000 - 08:46:07 EST)
  • chance and selection (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 16:51:02 EST)
  • chance and selection (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:09:17 EST)
  • chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 18:39:11 EST)
  • chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 13:07:13 EST)
  • chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 09:57:30 EST)
  • [creationevolutiondebate] Phil Johnson on the Second Law (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 15:54:03 EST)
  • Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 17:05:21 EST)
  • hi (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 18:44:10 EST)
  • choice as part of the design (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 13:18:23 EST)
• bill r wald
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 12:21:04 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 02:23:07 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 14:40:23 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 12:58:42 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 13:25:53 EST)
  • Re: Pascal's wager (was ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who ...) (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 14:58:46 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 14:16:35 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 12:45:35 EST)
  • Re: Rules of physics violated? (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 13:41:55 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 15:36:04 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 12:19:29 EST)
  • Re: choice as part of the design (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 14:30:33 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 12:34:40 EST)
• Brian D Harper
  • Re: Time window for OOL (part 4) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 17:18:04 EST)
  • Re: New list? (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 12:24:14 EST)
• Chris Cogan
  • Re: The blind leading the blind? Pseudo intellectuals a la carte! (Thu Nov 30 2000 - 19:08:06 EST)
  • Re: Chance and Selection (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:02 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 21:12:27 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 20:47:46 EST)
  • Re: Ultimate premises/Arguing for aguments sake! (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 22:45:38 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 17:24:07 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 17:15:42 EST)
  • Re: Ultimate premises (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 14:45:49 EST)
  • Re: Ultimate premises (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 07:30:09 EST)
  • Oops. Wrongly posted post. (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 07:23:52 EST)
  • Re: choice as part of the design (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 07:17:30 EST)
  • Ultimate premises (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 00:00:41 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 23:56:59 EST)
  • Re: choice as part of the design (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 23:28:23 EST)
  • Re: Nit wits & lollipops! (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 13:46:31 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 22:50:29 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 01:45:48 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 01:14:16 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or what he/it is) (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 00:48:17 EST)
• Daniel Gish
  • New info on Kenneth Hsu: (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 12:38:13 EST)
• David Bradbury
  • Recent "quality" posts. (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 17:44:53 EST)
• David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 15 2000 - 15:28:56 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 17:34:59 EST)
  • Re: Rules of physics violated? (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 15:33:21 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 00:58:05 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 00:10:42 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 08:07:11 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 23:56:30 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 14:51:06 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 01:11:46 EST)
  • cause of gravitation (was Re: Great web site) (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 23:44:54 EST)
• DNAunion@aol.com
  • Re: Natural and Supernatural (was Chance and Selection) (Thu Nov 30 2000 - 13:30:22 EST)
  • Re: Vague appeals to OST (retraction - kind of) (Mon Nov 27 2000 - 17:16:12 EST)
  • Re: Vague appeals to OST Parts 1-6 (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 02:57:29 EST)
  • Vague appeals to OST (retraction - kind of) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:55:54 EST)
  • Misc stuff on entropy, tendency, life (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:24:04 EST)
  • Vague appeals to OST (part 6) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:18:42 EST)
  • Vague appeals to OST (part 5) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:16:04 EST)
  • Vauge appeals to OST (part 4) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:13:35 EST)
  • Vague appeals to OST (part 3) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:12:07 EST)
  • Vauge appeals to OST (part 2) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:07:59 EST)
  • Vague appeals to OST (part 1) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 17:03:45 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 11:53:49 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 02:03:36 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 02:02:35 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 01:41:08 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 01:34:30 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 01:19:35 EST)
  • Re: ID and YEC in" Geotimes" (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 16:56:01 EST)
  • Re: Time window for OOL (part 4) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 15:03:40 EST)
  • Time window for OOL (part 5) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 14:02:06 EST)
  • Time window for OOL (part 4) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:58:18 EST)
  • Time window for OOL (part 3) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:53:53 EST)
  • Time window for OOL (part 2) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:49:33 EST)
  • Time window for OOL (part 1) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:42:47 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 12:21:04 EST)
  • Re: Tendency vs. behavior (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 13:45:14 EST)
  • Re: Overcome (and analogies) (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 17:08:06 EST)
  • Re: self-replicating molecules (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 16:51:04 EST)
  • Re: self-replicating molecules (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 16:35:06 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 12:37:48 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 11:39:48 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 11:08:16 EST)
  • Last 1 on attributing to wrong people? (Thu Nov 16 2000 - 22:15:45 EST)
  • Re: Tendency vs. behavior (Thu Nov 16 2000 - 17:56:49 EST)
  • Attributing statements to the wrong people (Thu Nov 16 2000 - 14:54:31 EST)
  • Overcome (and analogies) (Wed Nov 15 2000 - 14:13:03 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Nov 14 2000 - 22:46:06 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Nov 14 2000 - 21:36:34 EST)
  • Tendency vs. behavior (Tue Nov 14 2000 - 21:16:54 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 21:28:35 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 18:46:28 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 23:07:12 EST)
  • Re: Cold fusion is a fact (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 15:52:32 EST)
  • Cold fusion is a fact (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 14:36:45 EST)
  • Rules of physics violated? (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 14:21:06 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 12:35:10 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 12:34:39 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 01:57:10 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 01:55:08 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 22:47:23 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 21:31:52 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 21:16:51 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 13:39:50 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 12:56:07 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 11 2000 - 11:59:36 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 23:23:57 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 23:22:34 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 22:55:38 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 22:27:52 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 22:19:52 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 21:24:28 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 21:10:54 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 22:34:15 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 22:28:29 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 21:10:22 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 20:44:18 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 23:17:52 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 23:41:41 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 18:36:40 EST)
  • Re: Nothing comes from nothing or does it? (Sat Nov 04 2000 - 14:52:01 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sat Nov 04 2000 - 14:22:20 EST)
• Huxter4441@aol.com
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:27:10 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:25:04 EST)
  • Re: Dembski's `The Design Inference' peer reviewed? (was Examples of natural ... (Fri Nov 10 2000 - 15:15:03 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 09:15:21 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 20:08:05 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, K... (Sun Nov 05 2000 - 13:23:10 EST)
  • Re: Jonathan Wells' new book Icons of Evolution: The Cambrian Explosion . (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 14:48:38 EST)
  • correction (re: split between NWM and OWM) (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 14:17:20 EST)
• Ivar Ylvisaker
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 01:32:24 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 01:12:28 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sun Nov 05 2000 - 17:00:09 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sat Nov 04 2000 - 00:51:33 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 23:56:52 EST)
• Keith Littleton
  • Re: ID and YEC in" Geotimes" (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 19:56:03 EST)
  • ID and YEC in" Geotimes" (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 16:30:06 EST)
• li dorris
  • Re: Politeness (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 08:55:58 EST)
  • RE: Politeness (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 13:59:45 EST)
• Nelson Alonso
  • RE: Politeness (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 11:41:03 EST)
  • RE: Politeness (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 14:28:15 EST)
  • RE: Politeness (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 14:15:10 EST)
  • RE: Politeness (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 12:51:46 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 18:54:45 EST)
  • RE: Figure this one out! I dare you! nelson alonzo (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 16:44:05 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 13:21:23 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 11:06:08 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 22:36:28 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 21:17:07 EST)
  • RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 21:10:52 EST)
  • ID thinking (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 19:37:16 EST)
• Ralph Krumdieck
  • Re: Chance and Selection (Thu Nov 30 2000 - 03:30:44 EST)
  • Re: Que sera, sera!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Wed Nov 29 2000 - 12:02:52 EST)
  • Re: Chance and Selection (Sun Nov 26 2000 - 02:24:07 EST)
  • Re: Chance and Selection (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 02:46:48 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 02:19:35 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Sun Nov 19 2000 - 00:37:32 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 14:27:33 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 10:44:10 EST)
• Richard Wein
  • Natural and Supernatural (was Chance and Selection) (Thu Nov 30 2000 - 05:17:10 EST)
  • Dembski's confusion over specified complexity (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 03:54:50 EST)
  • Re: Politeness (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 06:50:30 EST)
  • Re: New list? (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 08:50:09 EST)
  • Politeness (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 08:40:19 EST)
  • Re: Overcome (and analogies) (Wed Nov 15 2000 - 15:46:46 EST)
  • Re: Tendency vs. behavior (Wed Nov 15 2000 - 13:14:36 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics" (Wed Nov 15 2000 - 12:59:13 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Nov 14 2000 - 05:09:33 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 16:36:25 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 06:16:44 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 06:11:59 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 20:08:33 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 07:11:34 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 04:33:17 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 07:19:07 EST)
  • Bank of England commemorates Charles Darwin (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 20:56:13 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 07:06:07 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 08:05:38 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Sat Nov 04 2000 - 09:09:27 EST)
  • Re: Examples of natural selection generating CSI (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 05:17:39 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 04:55:41 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 04:52:14 EST)
• silk
  • Fw: Why? there ain't no why to it (for you). (Wed Nov 29 2000 - 08:33:36 EST)
  • Que sera, sera!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Wed Nov 29 2000 - 05:39:20 EST)
  • For whatever it's worth! (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 05:24:04 EST)
  • The blind leading the blind? Pseudo intellectuals a la carte! (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 05:19:05 EST)
  • (no subject) (Fri Nov 24 2000 - 14:01:09 EST)
  • Fw: Pseudo Intellectuals & the horse they rode in on! (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 14:15:34 EST)
  • None dare call it treason! (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 07:56:04 EST)
  • Figure this one out! I dare you! nelson alonzo (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 08:11:05 EST)
  • Ultimate premises/Arguing for aguments sake! (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 02:21:05 EST)
  • Open Minds Please! (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 11:43:11 EST)
  • Nonsense & its double negatives confusing itself! (Sun Nov 05 2000 - 02:57:19 EST)
  • Nothing comes from nothing or does it? (Sat Nov 04 2000 - 13:03:17 EST)
  • monkey & the scientist? (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 12:18:47 EST)
  • Nit wits & lollipops! (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 07:20:52 EST)
  • Rearrange the data to suit your purposes & you can prove anything! (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 03:47:01 EST)
• sinem gungor
  • Asking a small favour from you (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 02:50:05 EST)
  • Asking a small favour from you (Thu Nov 23 2000 - 17:39:56 EST)
• Stephen E. Jones
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #5 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 17:26:57 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #4 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 17:26:06 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Sun Nov 26 2000 - 16:24:30 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #2 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Sun Nov 26 2000 - 16:36:00 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Sun Nov 26 2000 - 17:00:20 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #3 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Sun Nov 26 2000 - 16:36:56 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #1 (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 17:58:28 EST)
  • Fwd: [METAVIEWS] 098: Intelligent Design Coming Clean, Part 4 of 4 (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 17:53:29 EST)
  • Fwd: [METAVIEWS] 098: Intelligent Design Coming Clean, Part 3 of 4 (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 17:52:58 EST)
  • Fwd: [METAVIEWS] 098: Intelligent Design Coming Clean, Part 2 of 4 (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 17:52:38 EST)
  • Fwd: [METAVIEWS] 098: Intelligent Design Coming Clean, Part 1 of 4 (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 17:52:20 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 17:52:02 EST)
  • Re: Pascal's wager (was ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who ...) (Thu Nov 16 2000 - 21:45:31 EST)
  • Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger) (Thu Nov 16 2000 - 20:16:05 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Nov 15 2000 - 20:49:34 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 00:02:54 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 00:02:34 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 18:25:26 EST)
  • Re: Dembski's `The Design Inference' peer reviewed? (was Examples of natural selection generating CSI) (Thu Nov 09 2000 - 19:15:58 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 21:15:01 EST)
  • Re: Ultimate premises (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 21:06:09 EST)
  • Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' (was How to prove supernaturalism?) (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 20:52:59 EST)
  • Re: choice as part of the design (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 22:21:22 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 20:06:47 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 20:14:51 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, Kansas, Washington (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 19:05:36 EST)
  • Re: when natural selection pumps its complexity up to the next level (was Schutzenberger) (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 18:50:46 EST)
  • Re: Report by Jonathan Wells of tour of Arkansas, K... (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 18:43:26 EST)
• Susan Brassfield Cogan
  • knowing everything (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 07:23:59 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Sun Nov 19 2000 - 10:51:48 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 14:33:42 EST)
  • Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger) (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 09:48:15 EST)
  • Re: New list? (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 09:23:06 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 20:06:06 EST)
  • Re: Cold fusion is a fact (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 15:25:41 EST)
  • Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Phil Johnson on the Second Law (Sun Nov 12 2000 - 10:41:00 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 08:34:40 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 21:19:06 EST)
• Susan Cogan
  • Re: Que sera, sera!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Wed Nov 29 2000 - 12:54:41 EST)
  • Re: The blind leading the blind? Pseudo intellectuals a la carte! (Tue Nov 28 2000 - 15:12:20 EST)
  • Re: Fwd: [METAVIEWS] 098: Intelligent Design Coming Clean, Part 2 of 4 (Mon Nov 27 2000 - 17:56:43 EST)
  • RE: ID and Creationism (Mon Nov 27 2000 - 15:57:05 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Mon Nov 27 2000 - 15:37:25 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 13:17:19 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Wed Nov 22 2000 - 10:38:14 EST)
  • Re: ID and Creationism (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 15:05:20 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 17:44:51 EST)
  • Re: Fw: Pseudo Intellectuals & the horse they rode in on! (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 15:23:01 EST)
  • self-replicating molecules (Mon Nov 20 2000 - 15:13:52 EST)
  • Re: chance and selection (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 10:42:35 EST)
  • Re: None dare call it treason! (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 13:26:50 EST)
  • Re: Open Minds Please! (Wed Nov 08 2000 - 17:07:53 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Tue Nov 07 2000 - 17:40:34 EST)
  • Re: Great web site (Mon Nov 06 2000 - 17:45:24 EST)
  • Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh... (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 15:17:06 EST)
  • Re: New list? (Wed Nov 01 2000 - 15:18:41 EST)
• Tedd Hadley
  • Re: choice as part of the design (Fri Nov 03 2000 - 16:25:33 EST)
  • Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Fri Nov 03 2000 - 16:04:29 EST)

Last message date: Thu Nov 30 2000 - 20:09:53 EST
Archived on: Thu Nov 30 2000 - 20:09:56 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 20:09:56 EST