In a message dated 08/11/00 01:18:00 GMT Standard Time, sejones@iinet.net.au
writes:
S.E.Jones:
As I have commented before, Richard, like most evolutionists, seems to
have a need to convict his opponents not only of intellectual error (i.e.
mistakes) but also of *moral* error (i.e. dishonesty).
This indicates to me that deep down, they know their case is inadequate.
Paul Robson:
What would you think of an evolutionist who posted reams of quotes,
letters and articles culled from various sources and completely ignored
the voluminous responses posted by IDers and Creationists ?
Hint: Daniel
Note : Psychobabble (and nonsensical psychobabble at that !) does not
count as an "answer".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 04:41:33 EST