From: David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu
<David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu>
[...]
>>If these can experience decreases in entropy without a "code-driven
>>energy-conversion system", then obviously pre-biotic structures
>>can do so too.
>
>I disagree here. The above is a non sequiter. It is not obvious *at
>all* what is needed for the appropriate structures to form. But it is
>true that *if* it should be the case that some foreignly implanted
>"code-driven energy-conversion system" is necessary to form the necessary
>structures, then that necessity is not imposed by the 2nd law, and any
>appeal to it to argue for such a structure is invalid.
Point taken. I think I explained myself badly. When I said "pre-biotic
structures can do so too", I only meant that the Second Law wouldn't prevent
them from doing so. But there may be other reasons why they cannot do so.
>>I hope David will correct me if I've got anything wrong here. Sorry,
David,
>>but I hope you won't consider it a waste of time to educate me. ;-)
>
>Here are my comments. I really did not intend to take up nearly as much
>time as I ended up spending on this post. I hope that time was not
>wasted (w.r.t. list members *other* than Richard who seems to value
>my occasional tomes).
I keep assuming you will be able to answer my questions with a sentence or
two, but you end up giving me a whole lesson. And I'm very grateful for it.
I think perhaps I'm actually starting to understand the Second Law now. I
just hope you aren't going to bill me. ;-)
Richard Wein (Tich)
--------------------------------
The Second Law of Thermodenial: "In any closed mind the quantity of
ignorance remains constant or increases."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 09 2000 - 20:08:42 EST