Evolution - April 1996 by date

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon 01 Apr 1996 - 00:00:-48752 EDT
Ending: Tue 30 Apr 1996 - 00:00:-19891 EDT
Messages: 425

Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] #3 Stephen Jones
Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] #2 Stephen Jones
Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] #4 Stephen Jones
Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Bill Hamilton
Re: God is a Physicist bonhf-l@bgu.edu
Re: ACLU and free speech Jim Bell
Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re: "Primary literature" Stephen Jones
Re: neo-catastrophism John W. Burgeson
Re: Who Done It? John W. Burgeson
Re: ACLU and free speech Jim.Foley@symbios.com
God is a Physicist bonhf-l@bgu.edu
an interesting forward pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Brian D. Harper
Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: neo-catastrophism Bill Hamilton
Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Genesis Flood John W. Burgeson
Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
Re: FW: ACLU and free speech Asst Prof Clarence F Sills Jr
Re: Modelling of abiogenesis Arthur V. Chadwick
Modelling of abiogenesis David J. Tyler
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Brian D. Harper
ACLU and free speech pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
Re: Subject: Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Stephen Jones
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
Re: Who Done It? Stephen Jones
Re: "Primary literature" Stephen Jones
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
Can you be objective about evolution? pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
Re: ACLU and Free Speech Justin Keller
Re: Science: fact, fancy (and feet to fire) Steve Clark
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Steve Clark
Re: Quoting authorities Stephen Jones
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Stephen Jones
Re: Science and super... [2/2] Stephen Jones
RE: What part of "no...?" Chuck Warman
ACLU and Free Speech pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
Re: ACLU and free speech Justin Keller
Re: ACLU and free speech Jim Bell
RE: ACLU and free speech James E Hopper
What part of "no...?" John W. Burgeson
FW: ACLU and free speech John E. Rylander
RE: National Inquirer, Condensed Version Chuck Warman
RE: ACLU and free speech John E. Rylander
Can you be objective about evolution? pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
Re: National Inquirer, Condensed Version Tim Ikeda
RE: ACLU and free speech Chuck Warman
ACLU and free speech Jim.Foley@symbios.com
National Inquirer, Condensed Version Chuck Warman
Sagan and Swinburne Jim Bell
Re: Science: fact, fancy (and feet to fire) Jim Bell
Re: National Inquirer thinking Jim Bell
Re: Alternatives: Chance & Design (was Is it soup yet? #1] Brian D. Harper
Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: National Inquirer thinking Tim Ikeda
Re[2]: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re: Re[2]: neo-catastrophism Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re[3]: neo-catastrophism David S. Buchanan
Re: neo-catastrophism Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Science: fact, fancy (and feet to fire) Steve Clark
Re[2]: neo-catastrophism David S. Buchanan
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Denis Lamoureux
Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re: National Inquirer thinking Jim Bell
Re: neo-catastrophism David J. Tyler
Re[2]: neo-catastrophism David S. Buchanan
RE: How did we get that way? Brian D. Harper
Re: neo-catastrophism Randy Landrum
Re: National Inquirer thinking Tim Ikeda
National Inquirer thinking James Hopper
Re: Goodwin and common descent Stephen Jones
Re: Alternatives: Chance & Design (was Is it soup yet? #1] Stephen Jones
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Stephen Jones
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Stephen Jones
Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? John B. Tant
Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? Jim Bell
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Steve Clark
Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? John W. Burgeson
Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? John W. Burgeson
Re: History of Biology Chris Wozencraft
Can you be objective about evolution? pdd@gcc.cc.md.us
Re: History of Biology David S. Buchanan
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? Chuck Warman
RE: How did we get that way? Michael McCulloch
RE: History of Biology Chuck Warman
"TC" lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Brian D. Harper
History of Biology John B. Tant
Re: TE's vs. Naturalism Steve Clark
Re: What part of "no" don't I understand? Jim Bell
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: TE's vs. Naturalism lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
Re: TE's vs. Naturalism John W. Burgeson
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Brian D. Harper
Re: "Primary Literature" Justin Keller
What part of "no" don't I understand? John W. Burgeson
Re: TE's vs. Naturalism Tim Ikeda
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Stephen Jones
TE's vs. Naturalism lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Feet to the Fire Steve Clark
Re: "Primary Literature" Jim.Foley@symbios.com
RE: Blurring Creation & Providence? Bill Hamilton
Copy of: Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology John W. Burgeson
Re: macro-evolution Brian D. Harper
RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
Re: Isochrons Bill Hamilton
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Science and supernatural explanations [1/2] lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re:Science and supernatural explanations v.2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Patterson's 1981 AMNH transcript (was How the Leopard. Denis Lamoureux
Re: Feet to the Fire Jim Bell
Re: Patterson's 1981 AMNH transcript (was How the Leopard. Stephen Jones
RE: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
Re: Willimon article Stephen Jones
improbable == intervention ?? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
RE: "Primary Literature" Steve Clark
Re: Isochrons Steven Schimmrich
RE: "Primary Literature" John W. Burgeson
RE: "Primary Literature" John W. Burgeson
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Bill Hamilton
Re: Isochrons Bill Hamilton
Re: Isochrons Bill Hamilton
Re: macro-evolution Brian D. Harper
Re: Feet to the Fire Steve Clark
logical fallacies Justin Keller
Re: "Primary Literature" Jim.Foley@symbios.com
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Denis Lamoureux
RE: "Primary Literature" Jim Bell
RE: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Isochrons Steven Schimmrich
Reference to Greenstein SZYGMUNT@exodus.valpo.edu
Re: How did we get that way? Steve Clark
RE: Group Steve Clark
Re: How did we get that way? Bill Hamilton
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Brian D. Harper
Re[2]: Of PhDs, priests and logic David S. Buchanan
Isochrons Glenn Morton
RE: Group Chuck Warman
RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
Re: Group Steve Clark
RE: "Primary Literature" John W. Burgeson
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Steve Clark
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Stephen Jones
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #1/2 Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #1/2 Stephen Jones
Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
Re: Science and supernatural explanations #2/2 Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: Group Chuck Warman
Re: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Jim Bell
Re: Group Jim Bell
Group Thomas L Moore
RE: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Thomas L Moore
RE: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Chuck Warman
Re: Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) Denis Lamoureux
Intuition (Primarily Prophets, Priests, and Kings) lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Denis Lamoureux
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Brian D. Harper
RE: Primary literature Chuck Warman
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Brian D. Harper
one more follow-up on primary literature Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Tim Ikeda
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Tim Ikeda
Re: neo-catastrophism Steven Schimmrich
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: How did we get that way? Brian D. Harper
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
Re: Gray on Johnson Brian D. Harper
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Steven Schimmrich
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural michael farley
RE: "Primary literature" Jim Bell
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Jim Bell
Re: Gray on Johnson Jim Bell
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
RE: "Primary literature" Brian D. Harper
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural David J. Tyler
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Steve Clark
RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic...and paranoia Jim.Foley@symbios.com
"Primary literature" michael farley
Re: Primary literature Steven Schimmrich
RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
RE: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Steven Schimmrich
Re: How did we get that way? Denis Lamoureux
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural michael farley
Re: Who done it? Steven Schimmrich
RE: "Primary literature" Terry M. Gray
RE: "Primary Literature" Bill Hamilton
RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural David J. Tyler
RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
Re: neo-catastrophism Randy Landrum
RE: "Primary literature" Justin Keller
Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] Andrew MacRae
Re: Who Done It? Randy Landrum
RE: Primary Literature Steven Schimmrich
RE: "Primary Literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: How did we get that way? Brian D. Harper
RE: "Primary literature" Denis Lamoureux
RE: "Primary Literature" Chuck Warman
RE: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
RE: "Primary literature" Chuck Warman
Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Denis Lamoureux
Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: "Primary literature" Chuck Warman
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Chuck Warman
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic...and paranoia Chuck Warman
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Jim Bell
Re: "Primary literature" Jim Bell
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Tim Ikeda
Re: "Primary literature" Denis Lamoureux
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: "Primary literature" Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Thomas L Moore
Re: Johnson's "grasp" of AIDS Jim Bell
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Steven Schimmrich
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
Re: Subject: Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
Re: "Primary literature" Jim Bell
Re: Johnson and AIDS Steve Clark
Re: Who Done It? Steve Clark
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
Re: Can you be objective about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural David J. Tyler
Re: "Primary literature" Bill Hamilton
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Brian D. Harper
Johnson and AIDS John E. Rylander
Re: Quoting authorities Tim Ikeda
Who Done It? Chuck Warman
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Chuck Warman
Subject: Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Bill Hamilton
Re: "Primary literature" Denis Lamoureux
Re: "Primary literature" Terry M. Gray
"Primary literature" Jim Bell
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Steven Schimmrich
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Steve Clark
Re: Quoting authorities Jim Bell
Re: Quoting authorities Tim Ikeda
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Steve Clark
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Chuck Warman
Re: Jesus' Peculiar Truth (long) (fwd) jeffery lynn mullins
Re: Science and super... [2/2] Denis Lamoureux
Re: Of PhDs, priests and logic Denis Lamoureux
Quoting Jim Bell
Re: Science and super... [2/2] Brian D. Harper
Re: Science and super... [1/2] Brian D. Harper
Quoting authorities Terry M. Gray
Of PhDs, priests and logic Jim Bell
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Terry M. Gray
Re: river meanders Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Steven Schimmrich
river meanders Bill Hamilton
random observations on science and the supernatural Bill Hamilton
Goodwin and common descent Paul A. Nelson
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Mike Behe
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Bill Hamilton
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Tim Ikeda
Re: random observations on science and the supernatural Denis Lamoureux
What do you know for sure about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
Re:Science and supernatural events v.2 Bill Hamilton
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? James Hopper
Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
Re: Noah's Flood (was Old Earth) Arthur V. Chadwick
Noah's Flood (was Old Earth) Steven Schimmrich
New (old) articles posted: We Believe in Creation Terry M. Gray
Re: Is it soup yet? #1 Brian D. Harper
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Old Earth Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
Re: Old Earth Thomas L Moore
Re:Science and supernatural events v.2 Norm Smith
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Randy Landrum
Re: Old Earth Randy Landrum
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Terry M. Gray
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
Re: How did we get that way? Michael McCulloch
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Steve Clark
Re: How did we get that way? Steve Clark
Re: Can you be objectivea about evolution? Denis Lamoureux
How did we get that way? Bill Hamilton
Can you be objectivea about evolution? Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Jesus' Peculiar Truth (long) (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Jesus' Peculiar Truth (long) (fwd) Bill Hamilton
Re: Is it soup yet? #1 Stephen Jones
Re: Is killing humans bad? #2 (was How to Think About Natu Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Denis Lamoureux
Re: Week in Singapore 13-19 April 1996 Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: Is killing humans bad? #1 (was How to Think About Natu Stephen Jones
Re: Introduction Stephen Jones
Evidence for a young earth? Gordon Simons
Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
Science and supernatural events v.2 lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Steve Clark
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
Re: Old Earth Randy Landrum
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Chuck Warman
creation-evolution program David S. Buchanan
Re: Old Earth David J. Tyler
Re: Science and supernatural events lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: How to Think About Naturalism lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) John W. Burgeson
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) John W. Burgeson
Re: Science and supernatural explanations John W. Burgeson
re: various posts from Glenn Morton Bill Hamilton
various posts from Glenn Morton Bill Hamilton
RE: Blurring Creation & Providence? Bill Hamilton
Re: Science and supernatural explanations David J. Tyler
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Bill Hamilton
Re: Science and supernatural explanations Bill Hamilton
Re: Old Earth Steven Schimmrich
Re: Old Earth Randy Landrum
Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Lurker Q John W. Burgeson
Re: Questions from a Lurker Stephen Jones
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
RE: Old Earth Stephen Jones
Re: Creation >> assembly Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: Darwin's "Creator" (was Re[2]: Hello) Denis Lamoureux
Science and supernatural explanations lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: [really: trilobites] Andrew MacRae
Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Denis Lamoureux
Re: Questions from a Lurker Terry M. Gray
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Denis Lamoureux
Re: Questions from a Lurker Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Questions from a Lurker Terry M. Gray
Re: Jesus' Tomb and Bones Doug and Ping-chih Keil
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Chuck Warman
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Bill Hamilton
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Brian D. Harper
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
Re: Appearance of age Stephen Jones
Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
JESUS LOVES ME, THIS I KNOW, FOR THE BIBLE TELLS ME SO Gordon Simons
Re: [really: trilobites] Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: Interview with Dawkins [really: trilobites] Andrew MacRae
Re: Is it soup yet? #4 Denis Lamoureux
elliott sober Steve Clark
Re: Is it soup yet? #4 Brian D. Harper
Re: Jesus' Tomb and Bones Dennis L. Durst
Re: An appology(?) and a Question. John W. Burgeson
Re: Is it soup yet? #1 Brian D. Harper
RE: Jesus' Tomb and Bones John E. Rylander
Jesus' Tomb and Bones Steven Fawl
Lecture by Phil Johnson at Wheaton College Bill Hamilton
Re: How to Think About Naturalism Derek McLarnen
Introduction Derek McLarnen
Re: An appology(?) and a Question. Bill Hamilton
Re: An appology(?) and a Question. David J. Tyler
Tennessee Evolution Bill JHOFMANN@CCVAX.FULLERTON.EDU
Re: Creation >> assembly lhaarsma@OPAL.TUFTS.EDU
Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
Re: Interview with Dawkins Stephen Jones
Re: Old Earth Stephen Jones
Re: Is it soup yet? #4 Stephen Jones
RE: Kline article in PSCF (D. Kidner on Adam) Terry M. Gray
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Brian D. Harper
RE: Old Earth Michael McCulloch
Re: Creation >> assembly Stephen Jones
Re: Colin Patterson/Luther Sunderland Stephen Jones
RE: Old Earth Stephen Jones
Re: Some old threads Stephen Jones
Re: Colin Patterson/Luther Sunderland Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Arthur V. Chadwick
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Terry M. Gray
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Bill Hamilton
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Terry M. Gray
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Terry M. Gray
Re: Blurring Creation & Providence? Terry M. Gray
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Denis Lamoureux
Re: Focus on the Family Gordon Simons
RE: Focus on the Family Chuck Warman
Appearance of age John W. Burgeson
Re: Focus on the Family John W. Burgeson
Re: Focus on the Family John W. Burgeson
Re: Is it soup yet? #2 Stephen Jones
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
Re: Challenge to Atheists (was How to Think About Natu Stephen Jones
Re: Developmental Evolutionary Biology Stephen Jones
Re: How the Leopard...? (was Brian Goodwin on the web) Stephen Jones
Re: An appology(?) and a Question. Gordon Simons
Re: An appology(?) and a Question. Denis Lamoureux
An appology(?) and a Question. Russell T. Arndts
unconnected for the weekend Bill Hamilton

Last message date: Tue 30 Apr 1996 - 00:00:-19891 EDT
Archived on: Tue Apr 30 1996 - 18:28:44 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.