<<I am formally offering to Chuck and Jim to move this argument to private
e-mail and I will not publically respond to these issues any further.
Neither Chuck or Jim has provided any reason why they can't or shouldn't
persue the primary literature of the subject they are interested in.>>
This is a good place to end, for I think it demonstrates the complete
cross-purposes of the current discussion. But I have to clarify one thing. I
really don't know how Tom thinks I believe one shouldn't pursue the primary
literature. Nothing I've ever written says that. The Priesthood Fallacy, which
started all this, is merely an argument used by some to state that only those
with a certain level of attainment are allowed into a discussion. Nothing
more, nor less. Agree or disagree on that basis, not on something that isn't
there.
Jim