<<I would like to suggest another acronymic category for the group to use:
TC, for theologically correct. These would be defined as those who
steadfastly rail against the Secular University, Methodological Naturalism,
while conveniently ignoring the philosophical limitations of their own
epistemology.>>
Oh yeah? Who says you get to define TC? What are you, a relativist or
something?
Anyway, Theistic "Realists" have no limitations in epistemology TO ignore. It
is the Naturalist who erects an arbitrary barrier to Reality.
Naturalists say the world is either/or. Either purely natural, or purely
subjective (read: illogical, erroneous, boob infested).
TR's say: both/and. Natural law AND supernatural law. Where is the
epistemological limitation in that?
Jim