Your use of Goodwin in support of
>PC is like YEC using Gould and Eldredge and punctuated equilibrium in
>support of their view. Johnson plays the same games. He uses internal
>debates among people who are convinced of evolution to show that evolution
>is not true when neither side believes that their comments lead to that
>conclusion.
And just exactly what is wrong with showing evolutionists the fallacies of
their logic? Unpleasant to Gould et. al., yes...but wrong? Hardly. Since
when are internal debates less worthy sources than deliberate public
presentations? In fact exactly the opposite is true. While polished public
presentations are carefully developed to demonstrate the unassailable logic
of evolution, it is the behind the scenes rumbling that reveals the true
colors, as you are well aware.
Art
http://chadwicka.swac.edu