Re: random observations on science and the supernatural
Arthur V. Chadwick (chadwicka@swac.edu)
Thu, 18 Apr 1996 14:21:53 -0700Steve says:
> What if doing science using methodological naturalism doesn't support
>a literal reading of Genesis? Does that mean we need to trash MN in science?
>Does that mean MN can't arrive at the "Truth"? Or does that mean that some
>should rethink their interpretations of Scripture?
It means we should reconsider all of our philosophical bases.
Art
http://chadwicka.swac.edu