> Denis' response is to claim there is "evidence" *for* evolution, but
> Art (and Kerkut's) question was, for evolutionists to try to think of
> evidences *against* evolution. Denis' failure (to date) to post
> evdidence *against* evolution, simply confirms the profound truth
> behind Kerkut's dialogue between the professor and his student:
Hello Stephen,
If this is indeed the case, does it mean that "[Stephen]'s failure (to
date) to post evidences *against*" Denis' charge that Stephen
hacked Darwin quotes from the 'Origin of Species' "simply
confirm the profound truth" that Stephen didn't know what he was talking
about?
Regards,
Denis
----------------------------------------------------------
Denis O. Lamoureux DDS PhD PhD (cand)
Department of Oral Biology Residence:
Faculty of Dentistry # 1908
University of Alberta 8515-112 Street
Edmonton, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta
T6G 2N8 T6G 1K7
CANADA CANADA
Lab: (403) 492-1354
Residence: (403) 439-2648
Dental Office: (403) 425-4000
E-mail: dlamoure@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca
"In all debates, let truth be thy aim, and endeavor to gain
rather than expose thy opponent."
------------------------------------------------------------