ASA - January 2002
By Date

Starting: Tue Jan 01 2002 - 05:04:15 EST
Ending: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 20:52:51 EST

• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Steve Bishop (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 15:48:16 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? David F Siemens (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 20:49:22 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Steve Bishop (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 15:48:16 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? PHSEELY@aol.com (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 14:10:41 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Dawsonzhu@aol.com (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 13:09:46 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Dawsonzhu@aol.com (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 12:55:06 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Dawsonzhu@aol.com (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 12:43:40 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? David F Siemens (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 11:45:22 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Jan de Koning (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 11:19:07 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? David F Siemens (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 10:27:51 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? george murphy (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 10:05:45 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Woodward Norm Civ WRALC/TIEDM (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 09:36:07 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? PHSEELY@aol.com (Thu Jan 31 2002 - 02:51:54 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? george murphy (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 23:08:01 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Cmekve@aol.com (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 21:08:50 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Woodward Norm Civ WRALC/TIEDM (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 18:44:59 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Woodward Norm Civ WRALC/TIEDM (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 18:04:23 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Jan de Koning (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 16:39:38 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 22:01:22 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 21:40:53 EST)
• nebulae george murphy (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 12:22:46 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? John W Burgeson (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 12:09:55 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? george murphy (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 11:52:12 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? gordon brown (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 11:23:47 EST)
• ¹ýÑÛÐÂÊé2002.1--Óà½Ü¡¶Ïã²Ýɽ¡·.ºçÓ°¡¶K¡·¡ haoshuexpress (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 23:20:49 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 09:10:03 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 09:10:05 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Jan de Koning (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 20:59:15 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? PHSEELY@aol.com (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 19:27:34 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Richard Kouchoo (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 19:20:05 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Dick Fischer (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 16:32:31 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? John W Burgeson (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 17:14:59 EST)
• archaic human inventions Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 00:33:46 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Jan de Koning (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 10:24:05 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Vandergraaf, Chuck (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 10:35:46 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? John W Burgeson (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 09:46:50 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Vandergraaf, Chuck (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 09:38:19 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 09:15:06 EST)
• RE: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 29 2002 - 09:01:37 EST)
• Re: Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Walter Hicks (Mon Jan 28 2002 - 22:40:32 EST)
• Redheads descended from Neanderthals? Glenn Morton (Mon Jan 28 2002 - 23:30:49 EST)
• Acronyms Pharmadictionary@aol.com (Mon Jan 28 2002 - 04:24:17 EST)
• »¶Ó­ÄúʹÓÃËÑÒ×ϵÁÐÍøÉÏÓªÏúÈí¼þ! easytest8341@email.com (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 20:59:12 EST)
• Re: Bare Naked Noah robert6625 (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 20:57:49 EST)
• Re: Bare Naked Noah Dick Fischer (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 18:46:02 EST)
• Re: Bare Naked Noah John W Burgeson (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 16:52:26 EST)
• Re: Bare Naked Noah John W Burgeson (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 16:52:26 EST)
• a question about Genesis 46-47 PHSEELY@aol.com (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 15:31:49 EST)
• John Newton & William Cowper hymns SatTeacher@aol.com (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 07:56:58 EST)
• a question about Genesis 46-47 SatTeacher@aol.com (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 07:51:43 EST)
• RE: Bare Naked Noah Adrian Teo (Sun Jan 27 2002 - 01:45:15 EST)
• Re: Bare Naked Noah John W Burgeson (Sat Jan 26 2002 - 18:30:51 EST)
• Bare Naked Noah Dick Fischer (Sat Jan 26 2002 - 18:24:58 EST)
• RE: Whewell's contemporaries Glenn Morton (Sat Jan 26 2002 - 13:23:39 EST)
• ***LAST CHANCE...ADVERTISE TO 12,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY! IncreaseSalesToday@bigcashtoday.com (Fri Jan 25 2002 - 12:42:47 EST)
• RE: Whewell's contemporaries Woodward Norm Civ WRALC/TIEDM (Fri Jan 25 2002 - 14:14:02 EST)
• Whewell's contemporaries Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 25 2002 - 19:43:08 EST)
• RE: Distance of spiral nebulae Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 25 2002 - 08:21:33 EST)
• RE: The Star-Trek effect Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 25 2002 - 08:01:44 EST)
• Re: Distance of spiral nebulae Jonathan Clarke (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 17:14:00 EST)
• Re: telescopes Jonathan Clarke (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 16:42:11 EST)
• RE: The Star-Trek effect Woodward Norm Civ WRALC/TIEDM (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 16:28:24 EST)
• Britain is finally getting the message Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 23:20:07 EST)
• RE: Distance of spiral nebulae Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 09:24:45 EST)
• RE: telescopes Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 08:43:05 EST)
• ***ADVERTISE TO 12,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY! IncreaseSalesToday@bigcashtoday.com (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:42 EST)
• Does your website need more traffic? Get the best source of traffic anywhere... Best Source of Internet Traffic (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 12:06:01 EST)
• Distance of spiral nebulae Jonathan Clarke (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 17:28:45 EST)
• Re: telescopes Jonathan Clarke (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 16:48:22 EST)
• telescopes Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 24 2002 - 00:01:51 EST)
• Whewell's impact Jonathan Clarke (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 15:21:23 EST)
• RE: The Star-Trek effect Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 23:11:56 EST)
• RE: The Star-Trek effect Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 22:06:03 EST)
• Remove request postmaster@ugetmore4less.net (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 12:11:26 EST)
• Re: The Star-Trek effect Michael Roberts (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 08:23:27 EST)
• Re: The Star-Trek effect george murphy (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 05:01:31 EST)
• RE: The Star-Trek effect Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 09:09:27 EST)
• RE: The Star-Trek effect Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 09:02:57 EST)
• Re: The Star-Trek effect Jonathan Clarke (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 17:33:17 EST)
• Re: The Star-Trek effect george murphy (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 17:33:51 EST)
• The Star-Trek effect Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 23 2002 - 00:10:22 EST)
• Re: [ASA]RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 14:51:24 EST)
• Remove request postmaster@ugetmore4less.net (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 14:36:57 EST)
• RE: [ASA]RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 21:54:51 EST)
• Re: [ASA]RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 13:30:28 EST)
• JOBS: Physics Sabbatical Replacement at Dordt College Arnold Sikkema (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 12:28:19 EST)
• vounteers still needed Ted Davis (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 12:10:14 EST)
• Thank you for your prayers Mccarrick Alan D CRPH (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 07:59:06 EST)
• Re: [ASA]RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 07:40:57 EST)
• Does your website need more traffic? Get the best source of traffic anywhere... Best Source of Internet Traffic (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 14:42:48 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 09:06:04 EST)
• RE: [ASA]RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 09:06:05 EST)
• Re: [ASA]RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Scott Tucker (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 23:51:21 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 22:58:28 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB SteamDoc@aol.com (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 21:47:23 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Moorad Alexanian (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 20:38:36 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Moorad Alexanian (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 20:31:01 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 20:08:32 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB robert rogland (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 18:52:50 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB Michael Roberts (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 17:49:22 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB Michael Roberts (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 17:50:17 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 22 2002 - 00:22:36 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 15:59:13 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 23:50:49 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Scott Tucker (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 15:43:53 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Moorad Alexanian (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 15:11:21 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 22:41:59 EST)
• RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB Moorad Alexanian (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 13:39:17 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 12:31:05 EST)
• volunteers for email interviews Ted Davis (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 11:52:39 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB robert rogland (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 10:37:52 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB george murphy (Mon Jan 21 2002 - 10:14:22 EST)
• RE: tidbits on oil Vandergraaf, Chuck (Sun Jan 20 2002 - 21:38:09 EST)
• Remove request postmaster@ugetmore4less.net (Sun Jan 20 2002 - 20:28:23 EST)
• RE: tidbits on oil Glenn Morton (Sun Jan 20 2002 - 23:50:17 EST)
• RE: tidbits on oil Vandergraaf, Chuck (Sun Jan 20 2002 - 15:15:30 EST)
• Re: tidbits on oil Walter Hicks (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 20:22:03 EST)
• Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB PHSEELY@aol.com (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 18:48:24 EST)
• Does your website need more traffic? Get the best source of traffic anywhere... Best Source of Internet Traffic (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 11:48:28 EST)
• RE: tidbits on oil Glenn Morton (Sun Jan 20 2002 - 01:05:25 EST)
• Re: tidbits on oil Walter Hicks (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 15:43:30 EST)
• Re: John Murray 1840 young earther Michael Roberts (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 14:50:04 EST)
• Flawed anthro views of RTB Glenn Morton (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 21:57:51 EST)
• RE: tidbits on oil Glenn Morton (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 17:22:55 EST)
• Re: tidbits on oil Jack Haas (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 02:38:24 EST)
• tidbits on oil Glenn Morton (Sat Jan 19 2002 - 09:49:54 EST)
• Re: Research tools at the ASA web site James Mahaffy (Fri Jan 18 2002 - 20:54:43 EST)
• Re: John Murray 1840 young earther bivalve (Fri Jan 18 2002 - 19:27:40 EST)
• Feedback on Darwin's God James Mahaffy (Fri Jan 18 2002 - 18:37:05 EST)
• Neanderthal's technical prowess Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 18 2002 - 00:28:05 EST)
• RE: YEC and 19th cent Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 17 2002 - 09:05:09 EST)
• RE: YEC and 19th cent Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 17 2002 - 08:59:44 EST)
• Re: YEC and 19th cent Allen Roy (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 22:19:58 EST)
• Re: Research tools at the ASA web site Cmekve@aol.com (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 21:00:15 EST)
• Re: YEC and 19th cent Michael Roberts (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 17:58:45 EST)
• Status of YEC in U.S., 1848 bivalve (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 17:23:59 EST)
• Re: Research tools at the ASA web site Jack Haas (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 11:59:58 EST)
• YEC and 19th cent Ted Davis (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 16:07:05 EST)
• Brace's review of Tattersall's new book Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 23:55:25 EST)
• RE: John Murray 1840 young earther Glenn Morton (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 23:11:55 EST)
• Re: John Murray 1840 young earther Michael Roberts (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 12:07:46 EST)
• Re: Essay in Christian Century Keith B Miller (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 10:55:42 EST)
• Essay in Christian Century, responding to Crews article in NY Times Review of Books Ted Davis (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 09:40:03 EST)
• Re: John Murray 1840 young earther george murphy (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 09:27:40 EST)
• Does your website need more traffic? Get the best source of traffic anywhere... Great Products (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 07:49:22 EST)
• Brace's review of Tattersall's new book Marcio Pie (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 07:40:01 EST)
• Re: John Murray 1840 young earther Michael Roberts (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 02:42:55 EST)
• Re: John Murray 1840 young earther Gordon Simons (Wed Jan 16 2002 - 02:01:12 EST)
• Re: Research tools at the ASA web site Cmekve@aol.com (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 23:05:04 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Cmekve@aol.com (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 22:59:27 EST)
• Cleveland Plain Dealer article about evolution in Ohio schools Dale K Stalnaker (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 16:15:35 EST)
• John Murray 1840 young earther Glenn Morton (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 23:43:22 EST)
• Research tools at the ASA web site Terry M. Gray (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 12:04:54 EST)
• Re: P Johnson essay Howard J. Van Till (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 09:17:52 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Jack Haas (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 04:33:04 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Tue Jan 15 2002 - 04:46:51 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Cmekve@aol.com (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 20:45:29 EST)
• Re: Draper and White Terry M. Gray (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 15:25:52 EST)
• Re: Draper and White Steve Bishop (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 15:07:58 EST)
• Re: Draper and White Steve Bishop (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 15:07:58 EST)
• Re: Draper and White D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 14:52:02 EST)
• Re: Draper and White Michael Roberts (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 13:43:56 EST)
• Re: P Johnson essay SteamDoc@aol.com (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 13:44:35 EST)
• RE: Draper and White R. Joel Duff (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 13:11:01 EST)
• P Johnson essay Keith B Miller (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 10:56:50 EST)
• Draper and White SteamDoc@aol.com (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 11:44:37 EST)
• RE: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press tikeda@sprintmail.com (Mon Jan 14 2002 - 09:10:36 EST)
• Fwd: [ncse] Setting the Record Straight Now Available in html Dick Fischer (Sun Jan 13 2002 - 22:52:44 EST)
• Re: Your PSCF articles Dick Fischer (Sun Jan 13 2002 - 22:14:40 EST)
• Like DVD's? Burn Your Own copydvdsoft@yahoo.com (Sun Jan 13 2002 - 02:49:46 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Sun Jan 13 2002 - 16:47:47 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Sun Jan 13 2002 - 12:49:07 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Steve Bishop (Sun Jan 13 2002 - 14:25:46 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Jonathan Clarke (Sat Jan 12 2002 - 20:52:27 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Howard J. Van Till (Sat Jan 12 2002 - 20:13:37 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Jonathan Clarke (Sat Jan 12 2002 - 17:35:23 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Howard J. Van Till (Sat Jan 12 2002 - 17:18:23 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Sat Jan 12 2002 - 15:38:47 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Sat Jan 12 2002 - 15:20:51 EST)
• RE: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 21:05:28 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Cmekve@aol.com (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 20:17:59 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Cmekve@aol.com (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 19:59:33 EST)
• Re: Dembski bivalve (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 17:10:31 EST)
• Re: Dembski Jonathan Clarke (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 15:12:57 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Steve Bishop (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 15:18:25 EST)
• *****ADVERTISE TO 12 MILLION PEOPLE FREE! 56529602@bigcashtoday.com (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 15:05:54 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 12:48:21 EST)
• Re: Dembski John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 12:24:59 EST)
• Re: Dembski John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 12:18:16 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 12:11:46 EST)
• Prayer request Mccarrick Alan D CRPH (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 09:15:24 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 05:07:50 EST)
• The oldest art Morton, Glenn (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 02:09:09 EST)
• Re: Dembski Jonathan Clarke (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 00:56:49 EST)
• RE: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 08:36:52 EST)
• Re: DWM + NS Walter Hicks (Fri Jan 11 2002 - 00:09:22 EST)
• Re: DWM + NS tikeda@sprintmail.com (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 23:38:33 EST)
• Re: Dembski tikeda@sprintmail.com (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 21:21:33 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Cmekve@aol.com (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 20:45:09 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 18:48:12 EST)
• Re: Dembski John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 18:29:53 EST)
• Re: P.J. Bowler book Michael Roberts (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 16:49:20 EST)
• *****ADVERTISE TO 12 MILLION PEOPLE FREE! 21671059@bigcashtoday.com (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 10:49:51 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock...defending Christianity w/o reference to anything Christian Howard J. Van Till (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 16:08:10 EST)
• Dembski bivalve (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 15:40:20 EST)
• RE: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 23:09:16 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock...defending Christianity w/o reference to anything Christian Steve Bishop (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 15:09:23 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science bivalve (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 15:09:36 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 12:52:39 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 13:02:19 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 12:51:48 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock...defending Christianity w/o reference to anything Christian John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 12:52:13 EST)
• Re: DWM + NS Walter Hicks (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 09:17:19 EST)
• Re: DWM + NS Darryl Maddox (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 07:06:26 EST)
• DWM + NS Walter Hicks (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 02:06:47 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press george murphy (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 16:49:26 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Glenn Morton (Thu Jan 10 2002 - 00:40:57 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Howard J. Van Till (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 13:43:31 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock...defending Christianity w/o reference to anything Christian Joel Cannon (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 13:54:27 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 11:52:25 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Howard J. Van Till (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 11:18:07 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Howard J. Van Till (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 11:17:39 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press John W Burgeson (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 10:57:32 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Steve Bishop (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 10:51:49 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science george murphy (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 10:44:24 EST)
• Re: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Howard J. Van Till (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 10:15:04 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Howard J. Van Till (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 10:13:48 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Moorad Alexanian (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 08:46:13 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Moorad Alexanian (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 08:44:06 EST)
• *****ADVERTISE TO 12 MILLION PEOPLE FREE! 89702422@bigcashtoday.com (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 02:31:19 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 22:46:02 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 22:39:10 EST)
• P.J. Bowler book Cmekve@aol.com (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 20:01:51 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 15:28:31 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science bivalve (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 15:24:43 EST)
• Re: a request for help PHSEELY@aol.com (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 15:06:57 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science george murphy (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 14:39:51 EST)
• limits of change from Re: Pasteur and nature of science bivalve (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 14:47:43 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science bivalve (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 14:33:29 EST)
• Re: a request for help Michael Roberts (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 12:14:12 EST)
• 1 year physics opening at Calvin Stan Haan (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 12:11:46 EST)
• Anthology on ID Inge Frette (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 10:33:27 EST)
• Fw: [NEWS] Press Release: Dembski attacks Pennock and MIT Press Michael Roberts (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 10:10:39 EST)
• Re: a request for help PHSEELY@aol.com (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 01:41:16 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 23:11:33 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 23:33:40 EST)
• Re: a request for help Bill Payne (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 23:06:52 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 22:45:35 EST)
• Re: a request for help SteamDoc@aol.com (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:38:06 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 19:00:11 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 14:50:52 EST)
• a request for help SatTeacher@aol.com (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 16:39:51 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed Howard J. Van Till (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 15:40:27 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 13:59:29 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 13:10:12 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 10:20:14 EST)
• Pepperdine 2002: Deadline for papers approaching Ted Davis (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 10:03:38 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science george murphy (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 07:42:10 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Sun Jan 06 2002 - 23:49:58 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science george murphy (Sun Jan 06 2002 - 15:50:37 EST)
• 2002 Paleoanthropology abstracts Glenn Morton (Sun Jan 06 2002 - 19:47:47 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science tikeda@sprintmail.com (Sun Jan 06 2002 - 11:28:03 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Gordon Simons (Sun Jan 06 2002 - 00:05:49 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 23:13:12 EST)
• Re: Regarding the IDEA website tikeda@sprintmail.com (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 20:01:40 EST)
• Re: Regarding the IDEA website D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 14:00:07 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 13:04:15 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 11:00:36 EST)
• Re: Regarding the IDEA website Jonathan Clarke (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 05:08:45 EST)
• Re: Regarding the IDEA website SteamDoc@aol.com (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 00:10:44 EST)
• Re: Regarding the IDEA website george murphy (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 22:24:32 EST)
• Regarding the IDEA website Intelligent des Evolution awareness (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 20:21:41 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 19:59:36 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 16:50:55 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed Howard J. Van Till (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 14:13:10 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 13:07:22 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 13:25:45 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 13:15:24 EST)
• Re: Evolution Statement (corrected) Walter Hicks (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 09:54:04 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed SteamDoc@aol.com (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 22:11:06 EST)
• Earliest citizen of the British Empire Glenn Morton (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 00:27:33 EST)
• Re: Adam PHSEELY@aol.com (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:07:52 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? Peter Ruest (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:05:41 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed Michael Roberts (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:04:23 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed Howard J. Van Till (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 13:04:50 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 13:18:23 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 13:13:10 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed Darryl Maddox (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:36:13 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:02:21 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed John W Burgeson (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 11:56:39 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? PHSEELY@aol.com (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 03:48:06 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? PHSEELY@aol.com (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 02:32:50 EST)
• Re: Postmodernism and my statement SteamDoc@aol.com (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 22:15:34 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? george murphy (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 20:10:09 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? Dick Fischer (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 17:45:45 EST)
• Re: views of scientists-help needed george murphy (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 17:17:41 EST)
• views of scientists-help needed bivalve (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 16:07:20 EST)
• RE: "Flower in the Crannied Wall" Moorad Alexanian (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 15:37:38 EST)
• Re: "Flower in the Crannied Wall" george murphy (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 15:22:54 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? george murphy (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 15:13:38 EST)
• RE: Pasteur and nature of science Moorad Alexanian (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 13:05:18 EST)
• RE: "Flower in the Crannied Wall" Moorad Alexanian (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:53:51 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Gordon Simons (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:42:07 EST)
• Postmodernism and my statement Ted Davis (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:12:03 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? Dick Fischer (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:08:13 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science John W Burgeson (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 11:41:14 EST)
• Re: Evolution Statement John W Burgeson (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 11:35:58 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Dawsonzhu@aol.com (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 11:11:16 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Gordon Simons (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 09:45:25 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science george murphy (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 07:28:37 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Bill Payne (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 02:54:33 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? george murphy (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 22:34:12 EST)
• Historical Adam Dick Fischer (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 14:23:03 EST)
• Adam Dick Fischer (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 21:04:10 EST)
• Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis? Dick Fischer (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:07:14 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Gordon Simons (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 20:52:48 EST)
• Re: "Flower in the Crannied Wall" george murphy (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 19:41:32 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Gordon Simons (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 18:37:47 EST)
• Re: Evolution Statement bivalve (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 18:15:41 EST)
• Re: Pasteur quote bivalve (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 18:04:17 EST)
• RE: "Flower in the Crannied Wall" Moorad Alexanian (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:15:09 EST)
• Re: "Flower in the Crannied Wall" Michael Roberts (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 16:52:06 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Michael Roberts (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 16:51:56 EST)
• "Flower in the Crannied Wall" Moorad Alexanian (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 12:46:39 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Dawsonzhu@aol.com (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 12:15:29 EST)
• Skeptical Inquirer magazine : September 2001 : Design Yes, Intelligent No Moorad Alexanian (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 11:14:10 EST)
• Re: Who wrote, Dick Fischer deserves a hearing? Walter Hicks (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 13:38:23 EST)
• Re: Pasteur and nature of science Gordon Simons (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 09:21:25 EST)
• Who wrote, Dick Fischer deserves a hearing? RDehaan237@aol.com (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 05:03:38 EST)

Last message date: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 20:52:51 EST
Archived on: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 20:52:52 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 20:52:52 EST