George wrote, in part: "But there is a considerable amount of naivete &
carelessness."
We can agree on that, of course. I am 1/2 way through the Corey book --
what a disappointment. It fits the above, I'm
George also comments: " To the general theodicy question I would
just comment that:
a) process theology is too easy a solution, and
b) (as I have said before) any theodicy in which the cross is not
central isn't ultimately worth much."
Considering the degree of difficulty I've had in just BEGINNING to
understand process theology, I'd certainly not call it "easy." But it is
also not very satisfying. Of course I've been 40+ years a fairly
"conventional" Christian, and so new stuff is sometimes hard to
assimilate.
Thanks for commenting.
John Burgeson (Burgy)
http://www.burgy.50megs.com
(science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
humor, cars, God's intervention into natural causation, etc.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 10:32:51 EST