Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?

From: Dick Fischer (dickfischer@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:07:14 EST

Next message: Dick Fischer: "Adam"

Previous message: Gordon Simons: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"
Next in thread: george murphy: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"
Reply: george murphy: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

George Murphy wrote:

>Yes, Paul probably did think of Adam as an historical figure.

I agree with Paul.

Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
"The answer we should have known about 150 years ago"

Next message: Dick Fischer: "Adam"
Previous message: Gordon Simons: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"
Next in thread: george murphy: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"
Reply: george murphy: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 21:00:04 EST