Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?

From: Peter Ruest (pruest@pop.mysunrise.ch)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:05:41 EST

  • Next message: PHSEELY@aol.com: "Re: Adam"

    "Howard J. Van Till" wrote:
    >
    > And I could ask if you are so sure that your claims regarding the
    > inadequacies of the Creation's formational economy are correct that
    > you can declare:
    >
    > > > Howard's fully capable creational economy ... is a blank
    > theological formula which I feel is
    > > > scientifically preposterous, because it implies that
    > transastronomical amounts of
    > > > information are stored for some 10 billion years in literally
    > nothing,
    > > > with God doing nothing any more.
    >
    > You also say:
    >
    > > I would prefer a different style of discussion.
    >
    > I agree. Let's end the year on that note of concord.
    >
    > Best wishes for a blessed 2002.
    >
    > Howard Van Till

    Howard, I apologize and wish you also a blessed new year!

    Peter Ruest

    -- 
    Dr Peter Ruest, <pruest@dplanet.ch>
    CH-3148 Lanzenhaeusern, Switzerland
    Biochemistry - Creation and evolution
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Creative providence in biology (Gen.2:3):
    "..the work which God created (in order) to (actively) evolve it"
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:07:40 EST