Re: Pasteur and nature of science

From: Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@uncwil.edu)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 08:46:13 EST

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"

    Evolution is inexorably connected with the Big Bang and there the initial
    condition is assumed to be simple and complexity, in cosmology at least,
    increased with time. Moorad

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Bill Payne" <bpayne15@juno.com>
    To: <gmurphy@raex.com>
    Cc: <bpayne15@juno.com>; <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:46 PM
    Subject: Re: Pasteur and nature of science

    > On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:39:51 -0500 george murphy <gmurphy@raex.com>
    > writes:
    >
    > > I'll repeat the point that I made at the beginning & which has not been
    > refuted: Evolution
    > > does not involve increase in complexity as a matter of definition.
    >
    > That should not be refuted; I agree, as a matter of definition. But if
    > there is not a generally increasing vector of complexity, with only minor
    > countercurrents, then the theory fails to explain how we got here.
    >
    > Bill
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 09 2002 - 08:45:21 EST