Re: Pasteur and nature of science

From: Bill Payne (bpayne15@juno.com)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 23:11:33 EST

  • Next message: Bill Payne: "Re: a request for help"

    Sorry, I don't follow at all what you are saying.

    Bill

    On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:59:29 -0700 "D. F. Siemens, Jr."
    <dfsiemensjr@juno.com> writes:
    >
    > On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:49:58 -0600 Bill Payne <bpayne15@juno.com>
    > writes:
    > in small part
    > >
    > > Without the concept of "molecules to man" (increasing
    > complexity),
    > > you
    > > cut the heart out of the theory.
    > >
    > > Bill
    > > ________________________________________________________________
    >
    > By adding this you cut out Sacculina and all of the tapeworms, as
    > well as the fact that bacteria continue to exist. This, too, is
    > proof by crooked definition.
    > Dave



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 23:41:26 EST