George wrote: "It's also worth noting that Dembski doesn't attempt to
engage any arguments of "theistic evolutionists" themselves, but
essentially allows the "Darwinian establishment" to represent them. In
the Appendix of _Intelligent Design_ he responds to a number of
"objections to design" but gives no hint that there are any _theological_
objections to his program."
This, to me, is perhaps the chief failing of the ID movement.
John Burgeson (Burgy)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 10 2002 - 13:06:30 EST