Evolution - August 2000
By Date

Starting: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 18:23:37 EDT
Ending: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:35 EDT

• Re: ID vs. ? Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:06:34 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Richard Wein (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 18:37:19 EDT)
• ID vs.? Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 14:31:15 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 13:19:20 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 12:59:14 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Tedd Hadley (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 12:54:45 EDT)
• ID vs. ? Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 09:30:19 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Richard Wein (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 05:28:49 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Richard Wein (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 19:31:02 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Cliff Lundberg (Thu Aug 31 2000 - 01:22:31 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Cliff Lundberg (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 23:54:35 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Chris Cogan (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 23:55:25 EDT)
• RE: ID vs. ? Stephen E. Jones (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 18:20:50 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Tedd Hadley (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 17:22:18 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Richard Wein (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 16:14:58 EDT)
• ID vs. ? Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 15:56:08 EDT)
• ID vs ? Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 14:57:17 EDT)
• ID vs. ? Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 14:39:29 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Chris Cogan (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 13:28:04 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Cliff Lundberg (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 12:49:43 EDT)
• Re: ID vs.? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 12:53:43 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Richard Wein (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 12:23:08 EDT)
• Re: ID vs ? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 09:20:19 EDT)
• ID vs. ? Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 09:10:21 EDT)
• Evidence against ID? Chris Cogan (Wed Aug 30 2000 - 00:30:44 EDT)
• Re: ID vs.? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:09:59 EDT)
• Evolution of biological information FMAJ1019@aol.com (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:07:20 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? FMAJ1019@aol.com (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:06:01 EDT)
• Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! Susan Brassfield Cogan (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 15:20:51 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 08:57:20 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Cliff Lundberg (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 03:17:50 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Chris Cogan (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 02:15:20 EDT)
• Re: ID vs.? Chris Cogan (Tue Aug 29 2000 - 01:42:39 EDT)
• Re: Darwin wars Stephen E. Jones (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 17:55:44 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Brian D Harper (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 19:24:14 EDT)
• RE: ID vs.? Cliff Hamrick (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 11:00:05 EDT)
• Re: Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection. Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 15:20:54 EDT)
• ID vs ? Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 14:39:12 EDT)
• ID vs.? Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 13:34:19 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Tedd Hadley (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 13:07:07 EDT)
• Re: ID vs. ? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 12:57:34 EDT)
• RE: ID vs. ? Cliff Hamrick (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 06:30:04 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Mon Aug 28 2000 - 10:19:34 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Cliff Lundberg (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 13:24:12 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 16:29:06 EDT)
• Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection. Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 12:45:18 EDT)
• Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection. Chris Cogan (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 11:45:15 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 05:00:41 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 04:40:27 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Chris Cogan (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 01:53:32 EDT)
• Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (was the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? ...) Chris Cogan (Sun Aug 27 2000 - 01:53:05 EDT)
• Re: Dembski 1/2 Cliff Lundberg (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 17:36:38 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Cliff Lundberg (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 16:40:12 EDT)
• Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 17:23:09 EDT)
• Dembski 1/2 Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 15:02:33 EDT)
• ID vs. ? Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 12:17:26 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 05:48:02 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 05:00:13 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Chris Cogan (Sat Aug 26 2000 - 02:28:44 EDT)
• Re: quote is wildly out of context? (was A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2) Cliff Lundberg (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 23:50:33 EDT)
• Re: quote is wildly out of context? (was A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2) Stephen E. Jones (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 20:30:56 EDT)
• Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any! (was the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? ...) Stephen E. Jones (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 18:09:56 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Brian D Harper (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 19:15:37 EDT)
• Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Aug 25 2000 - 13:50:42 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2 Cliff Lundberg (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 21:52:22 EDT)
• Re: A Pyrrhic Victory For Kansas Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 19:00:34 EDT)
• Re: Study Shows Out-Of-Africa Migration to Israel Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 17:44:35 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Brian D Harper (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 21:35:03 EDT)
• Why evolution is not truly random Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 17:26:16 EDT)
• Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 15:32:01 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2 Susan Brassfield Cogan (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 15:15:40 EDT)
• Re: U of Cal embarrassed by loony professor on Nightline Huxter4441@aol.com (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 10:45:57 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Richard Wein (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 05:37:54 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 24 2000 - 02:53:06 EDT)
• Re: Macro, Shmacro Stephen E. Jones (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 19:07:08 EDT)
• U of Cal embarrassed by loony professor on Nightline Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 18:59:34 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:28:10 EDT)
• Re: Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Brian D Harper (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:44:15 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 18:32:24 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Stephen E. Jones (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 18:18:17 EDT)
• Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 15:00:38 EDT)
• another interview with Phil Johnson Brian D Harper (Tue Aug 22 2000 - 00:15:45 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Brian D Harper (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 22:11:21 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from ... Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 15:49:07 EDT)
• Piecemeal genetic differences as support for macroevolution, etc. Chris Cogan (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 02:35:27 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Chris Cogan (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 01:35:54 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Chris Cogan (Mon Aug 21 2000 - 01:35:13 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Richard Wein (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 20:05:30 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 1/2 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 16:54:54 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski 2/2 Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 10:35:24 EDT)
• Re: the `body language' of a threatened `priesthood'? (was More fiction from Stephen) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 20 2000 - 05:47:49 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 22:23:29 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski Brian D Harper (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 20:11:31 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 12:41:35 EDT)
• A Baylor scientist on Dembski Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 12:35:47 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield (Sat Aug 19 2000 - 10:40:36 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) billwald@juno.com (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 16:45:46 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Brian D Harper (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 17:58:43 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Cliff Lundberg (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 14:22:25 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Tedd Hadley (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 12:58:38 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Chris Cogan (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 09:19:32 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Cliff Lundberg (Fri Aug 18 2000 - 01:49:59 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:42:34 EDT)
• A Baylor scientist on Dembski Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:11:16 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield Cogan (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 15:29:32 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 14:04:51 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Cliff Lundberg (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 13:22:10 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield Cogan (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 12:50:06 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument billwald@juno.com (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 13:02:58 EDT)
• A Baylor scientist on Dembski Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 12:35:24 EDT)
• Another ID argument Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 11:39:43 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Richard Wein (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 11:40:50 EDT)
• Re: Kansas standards: religious values = myths? (was Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs) Richard Wein (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 10:10:40 EDT)
• Re: Macro, Shmacro Richard Wein (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 10:08:37 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 09:02:04 EDT)
• Macro, Shmacro Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 17 2000 - 01:51:02 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Stephen E. Jones (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 18:20:16 EDT)
• Re: Kansas standards: religious values = myths? (was Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs) Stephen E. Jones (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 18:19:47 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski David Bradbury (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 15:37:03 EDT)
• Another ID argument Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 13:58:30 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument billwald@juno.com (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 14:05:53 EDT)
• Another ID argument Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 11:02:30 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument Chris Cogan (Wed Aug 16 2000 - 02:05:14 EDT)
• More fiction from Stephen Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:17:35 EDT)
• Re: Johnson's complacency Stephen E. Jones (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 18:23:18 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 18:09:18 EDT)
• Re: What is a "Darwinist'? Huxter4441@aol.com (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 16:57:57 EDT)
• Baylor Scientist on Dembski Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 16:08:16 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Richard Wein (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:49:42 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield Cogan (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:24:09 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield Cogan (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:15:53 EDT)
• A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 14:20:06 EDT)
• A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 13:49:28 EDT)
• Another ID argument Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 13:45:20 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Cliff Hamrick (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 05:41:03 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument Richard Wein (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 10:22:58 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument Chris Cogan (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 08:36:41 EDT)
• Re: Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs Richard Wein (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 06:14:34 EDT)
• Re: A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Richard Wein (Tue Aug 15 2000 - 05:20:54 EDT)
• ADV: mytvtaxi.com - Everything TV! mytvtaxi.com (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 19:22:35 EDT)
• A Baylor Scientist on Dembski Susan Brassfield (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 18:24:25 EDT)
• Re: Study Fuels Debate on Whether Birds Are Dinosaurs Stephen E. Jones (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 17:48:12 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Tedd Hadley (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 15:09:26 EDT)
• Re: What is a "Darwinist'? Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 12:53:00 EDT)
• Interesting paper Wesley R. Elsberry (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 12:18:47 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:49:05 EDT)
• Another ID argument Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:50:24 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:44:54 EDT)
• Another ID argument Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:37:56 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument Chris Cogan (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 10:15:01 EDT)
• Re: Another ID argument Huxter4441@aol.com (Mon Aug 14 2000 - 09:34:47 EDT)
• Another ID argument Richard Wein (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 13:59:14 EDT)
• What is a Darwinist? Bertvan@aol.com (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 12:04:25 EDT)
• ADV - ATHLETIC DIRECTOR Craig De Lisle (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 09:39:46 EDT)
• Johnson's complacency Wesley R. Elsberry (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 11:33:53 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Richard Wein (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 08:26:19 EDT)
• Re: What is a "Darwinist'? Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 07:48:54 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 17:48:51 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 02:12:32 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Brian D Harper (Sun Aug 13 2000 - 00:14:34 EDT)
• What is a "Darwinist'? Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 20:41:45 EDT)
• Re: What is a "Darwinist"? Huxter4441@aol.com (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 17:29:57 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy billwald@juno.com (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 13:14:00 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy billwald@juno.com (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 13:01:09 EDT)
• More about teaching the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 10:51:45 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Richard Wein (Sat Aug 12 2000 - 09:01:32 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 17:50:13 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 10:57:05 EDT)
• More about teaching the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 09:29:55 EDT)
• What is a "Darwinist"? Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 08:25:16 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Chris Cogan (Fri Aug 11 2000 - 03:04:19 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) billwald@juno.com (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 23:48:37 EDT)
• Hey Bertvan - Whats a 'Darwinist'? Huxter4441@aol.com (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 23:04:06 EDT)
• More about teaching the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 20:49:20 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Tedd Hadley (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:55:10 EDT)
• Re: The Wedge of Truth-Amazon.com customer reviews Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:14:50 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Susan Brassfield Cogan (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:29:45 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 18:27:43 EDT)
• More about teaching the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 16:56:15 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Tedd Hadley (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 13:44:04 EDT)
• More about teaching the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 12:01:41 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy Richard Wein (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 08:19:53 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Richard Wein (Thu Aug 10 2000 - 07:20:26 EDT)
• Re: anti-evolutionists booted out Susan Brassfield (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 21:22:21 EDT)
• Re: More about teaching the controversy Tedd Hadley (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 19:39:56 EDT)
• More about teaching the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 17:49:59 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 15:19:06 EDT)
• Re: Teaching the Controversy Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 15:11:42 EDT)
• Re: Teaching the Controversy David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 14:13:03 EDT)
• Re: Teaching the Controversy Tedd Hadley (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 13:05:32 EDT)
• Re: Teaching the Controversy Susan Brassfield Cogan (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 12:49:44 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy Richard Wein (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 10:37:06 EDT)
• Teaching the Controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 12:20:22 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy Tedd Hadley (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 12:08:04 EDT)
• RE: Teach the controversy Terry Trainor (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 04:03:30 EDT)
• Teach the Controversy Wesley R. Elsberry (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 01:05:56 EDT)
• what is life, anyway? billwald@juno.com (Wed Aug 09 2000 - 00:21:41 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy billwald@juno.com (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:38:10 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy pearson@panam1.panam.edu (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:25:20 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in Reverse Chris Cogan (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:11:12 EDT)
• Teach the Controversy Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 23:32:15 EDT)
• Re: Teach the controversy Susan Brassfield (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:13:27 EDT)
• Re: Teach the Controversy Susan Brassfield (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:11:18 EDT)
• Teach the controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:05:52 EDT)
• Teach the Controversy Wesley R. Elsberry (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 22:41:28 EDT)
• Teach the Controversy Bertvan@aol.com (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 19:41:08 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? Richard Wein (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 18:42:57 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? David Bradbury (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 15:11:07 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Cliff Lundberg (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 13:18:00 EDT)
• auth 3ef8b22a subscribe evolution slccfrontliner@hotmail.com Larry Chefalo (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 12:40:56 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Tedd Hadley (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 12:33:44 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Steven P Crawford (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 09:47:25 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Cliff Lundberg (Tue Aug 08 2000 - 00:00:23 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Steven P Crawford (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 23:15:25 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Richard Wein (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:31:19 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 17:35:07 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Tedd Hadley (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 17:25:54 EDT)
• Re: A Question of Abiogenesis Susan Brassfield Cogan (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 15:08:15 EDT)
• A question of Abiogenesis Bertvan@aol.com (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 14:05:09 EDT)
• A Question of Abiogenesis Steven P Crawford (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 09:54:54 EDT)
• Re: ID unfalsifiable? (was Designed Designers?) Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 17:52:02 EDT)
• Re: anti-evolutionists booted out Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 05:04:18 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Stephen E. Jones (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 03:43:03 EDT)
• Re: Just a Theory Susan Brassfield (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 08:43:03 EDT)
• Re: random genetic drift vs natural selection Cliff Lundberg (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 05:13:58 EDT)
• Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review Steven P Crawford (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 23:17:07 EDT)
• Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review Brian D Harper (Sun Aug 06 2000 - 00:17:30 EDT)
• Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review billwald@juno.com (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 20:52:08 EDT)
• Re: Just a Theory billwald@juno.com (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 20:35:07 EDT)
• Re: random genetic drift vs natural selection (was Scopes in reverse) Stephen E. Jones (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 20:40:59 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? David Bradbury (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 19:48:38 EDT)
• Fw: Fw: Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 15:07:46 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 15:57:57 EDT)
• Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review Steven P Crawford (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 15:04:14 EDT)
• Designed Designers? Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 13:54:49 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 09:21:37 EDT)
• Designed Designers? Bertvan@aol.com (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 12:52:11 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Richard Wein (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 10:01:41 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in Reverse Bill Payne (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 09:47:00 EDT)
• Re: Mike Behe: Response to critics concerning peer-review Stephen E. Jones (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 09:16:36 EDT)
• Re: Just a Theory Terry Trainor (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 08:34:48 EDT)
• Re: Just a Theory Terry Trainor (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 08:26:05 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Richard Wein (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 06:04:24 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 22:49:33 EDT)
• Re: Just a Theory Chris Cogan (Sat Aug 05 2000 - 00:28:08 EDT)
• Re: Just a Theory billwald@juno.com (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 21:41:13 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? billwald@juno.com (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 21:36:43 EDT)
• Designed Designers? Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 16:29:50 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? billwald@juno.com (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 13:12:33 EDT)
• Just a Theory Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 13:30:20 EDT)
• Designed Designers? Bertvan@aol.com (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 12:17:49 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse Susan Brassfield Cogan (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 09:54:01 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Richard Wein (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 09:07:42 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Fri Aug 04 2000 - 00:46:10 EDT)
• Re: anti-evolutionists booted out Susan Brassfield (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 20:38:38 EDT)
• Macroevolution vs. ID theory Chris Cogan (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 20:01:19 EDT)
• Re: anti-evolutionists booted out Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 19:36:51 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Stephen E. Jones (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 10:26:47 EDT)
• Re: Designed Designers? Richard Wein (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 17:16:37 EDT)
• anti-evolutionists booted out Susan Brassfield Cogan (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 17:05:14 EDT)
• Re: Fw: Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Thu Aug 03 2000 - 10:50:40 EDT)
• Re: Fw: Re: Designed Designers? Chris Cogan (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 23:56:45 EDT)
• Fw: Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:01:09 EDT)
• Fw: Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:02:02 EDT)
• Fw: Re: Van Till's chapter Steven P Crawford (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:00:40 EDT)
• Fw: Re: Designed Designers? Steven P Crawford (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:01:37 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse billwald@juno.com (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:29:28 EDT)
• Re: Is anybody out there? billwald@juno.com (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 22:18:22 EDT)
• RE: Behe responds to critics! Stephen E. Jones (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 18:38:23 EDT)
• Re: Is anybody out there? Stephen E. Jones (Wed Aug 02 2000 - 17:56:56 EDT)
• Re: Scopes in reverse Stephen E. Jones (Tue Aug 01 2000 - 17:56:15 EDT)
• Re: Nightline Stephen E. Jones (Tue Aug 01 2000 - 17:53:45 EDT)

Last message date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:35 EDT
Archived on: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:39 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 19:10:39 EDT