Bertvan:
>You will note that the Baylor professors, don't just consider IDn an invalid
>concept; They argue that no one, including college students, should be
>allowed to consider it.
please include the passage where they state this. I don't remember seeing
anything like that in anything the Baylor professor wrote. If ID is deemed
not to be science then it has no place being "considered" science class.
Why should it have a special priviledge? Music theory doesn't get
considered in science class either. If there is *scientific* evidence to
support ID, then it should be mentioned in science class and I think it is
scientific evidence that the Baylor professors are looking for.
ID propagandists are ubiquitus. It is already very easy for
students--especially Baylor students--to be exposed to their ideas.
I'm sure Baylor has debate classes--usually, they are offered through the
Communications Department. In those classes students are free to discuss
the merits of ID until the cows come home. Victory can be awarded to the
student with the most well-mannered presentation.
Susan
----------
The most important human endeavor is the striving for morality in our
actions. Our inner balance and even our very existence depend on it. Only
morality in our actions can give beauty and dignity to life.
--Albert Einstein
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 15:18:37 EDT