Re: ID vs. ?

• Previous message: Susan Brassfield Cogan: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
• Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 09:30 AM 08/31/2000, you wrote:

> >
> >Bertvan
> >>I don't agree with everything everyone has said on the subject of Gaia. I
>do
> >>believe the earth evolved, much in the same way individual organisms
>evolved.
> >>(However that was, it obviously wasn't by random variation and natural
> >>selection.)
>
>Chris
> >Why is this obvious? What is the *evidence* that it was by some other means?
>
>Bertvan:
>If there is only one earth, there was no "survival of the fittest".

Chris
There's no "survival of the fittest" in the way individual organisms
evolved? Again: What is the evidence for this? I agree that the Earth has
evolved (i.e., changed over time), but how is this like the evolution of
individual organisms?

• Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs.?"
• Previous message: Susan Brassfield Cogan: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
• Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 13:22:39 EDT