Re: ID vs. ?

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:06:01 EDT

Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Evolution of biological information"

Previous message: Susan Brassfield Cogan: "Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any!"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>(Bertvan) ID allows the possibility of a god, but does not require one.

More interestingly to me, ID does not eliminate the possibility of a natural
designer.

But I agree with Cliff that for most ID proponents, ID is used to describe
their God. I guess Gaia worshippers can now also use ID.

But then again how does one define ID anyway?

Next message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Evolution of biological information"
Previous message: Susan Brassfield Cogan: "Re: evidence against Darwinism-there isn't any!"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 29 2000 - 23:06:21 EDT