Susan:
>please include the passage where they state this. I don't remember seeing
>anything like that in anything the Baylor professor wrote. If ID is deemed
>not to be science then it has no place being "considered" science class.
>Why should it have a special priviledge? Music theory doesn't get
>considered in science class either. If there is *scientific* evidence to
>support ID, then it should be mentioned in science class and I think it is
>scientific evidence that the Baylor professors are looking for.
>ID propagandists are ubiquitus. It is already very easy for
>students--especially Baylor students--to be exposed to their ideas.
>I'm sure Baylor has debate classes--usually, they are offered through the
>Communications Department. In those classes students are free to discuss
>the merits of ID until the cows come home. Victory can be awarded to the
>student with the most well-mannered presentation.
Bertvan:
At Baylor, ID was being considered at a conference by the Polyani Center. Not
a science class. Speakers from both sides were invited. The biology
department is trying to shut down the center for this piece of irreverence.
Bertvan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 16:08:33 EDT