ID vs. ?

• Previous message: Chris Cogan: "Evidence against ID?"
• Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
• Next in thread: Cliff Hamrick: "RE: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe reply: Cliff Hamrick: "RE: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe reply: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Reply: Chris Cogan: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hi FMA,

ID hasn't yet become dogmatic enough to have a rigid definition. My
definition is merely the conclusion that universe is the result of a rational
design, rather the result of random processes. It includes the belief that
life consists of more than matter and the impersonal physical forces we now
recognize. (mind, creativity, spontaneity, free will are forces science does
not presently know how to deal with) The Gaia concept is certainly a part of
ID.
Bertvan

• Next message: Susan Brassfield Cogan: "Re: ID vs ?"
• Previous message: Chris Cogan: "Evidence against ID?"
• Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
• Next in thread: Cliff Hamrick: "RE: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe reply: Cliff Hamrick: "RE: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe reply: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Reply: Chris Cogan: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 30 2000 - 09:10:35 EDT