RE: Teach the controversy

• Previous message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Teach the Controversy"
• Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Teach the controversy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

That would be In evolutionary biology, IIRC.

> [Original Message]
> From: <Bertvan@aol.com>
> To: <evolution@calvin.edu>
> Date: 08/08/2000 9:06:03 PM
> Subject: Teach the controversy
>
> Wesley:
> >I notice that Mr. Easterbrook doesn't suggest in which non-science
> >class Intelligent Design non-science controversies should be
> >taught.
>
> Bertvan
> I would suggest the same class where just so stories are taught.
> Bertvan
> http://members.aol.com/bertvan

Terry Trainor
homepage:
http://home.earthlink.net/~tandjtrainor/index.html
discussion:
http://communities.msn.com/Ta

• Next message: Tedd Hadley: "Re: Teach the Controversy"
• Previous message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Teach the Controversy"
• Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Teach the controversy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 09 2000 - 04:06:30 EDT