Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection.

From: Chris Cogan (ccogan@telepath.com)
Date: Sun Aug 27 2000 - 11:45:15 EDT

  • Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Selection "standard" determines type of results of selection."

    Whether evolution produces results that "look" designed depends on the
    selection criteria. If selection is random, then the overall results will
    look random, with a few instances looking (out of context), like instances
    of design. If selection selects *for* randomness, then none of the results
    will look designed, because each genome will be random (we have to assume
    that there is an external method of ensuring that genomes get reproduced
    even when they are not part of a viable organism).

    But, if evolution occurs in a real world like ours, all living organisms
    will look designed because, in order to live at all, an organism must be
    functional, its components must work together, it must be able to
    metabolize, or at least use externally-supplied energy in a way that does
    not destroy the organism itself, etc.

    Functionality, or biological viability, requires organization structure
    that is not random. It is this order and the functionality of it that ID
    mistakes for design. Yet, evolution in a world of physical lawfulness, and
    semi-stable environments must necessarily produce these kinds of results.

    It produces these results by virtue of the filtering effect of the
    environment, which *only* allows "design-like" organisms to survive (and by
    no means even *all* of *them*).

    It is mathematically trivial to show that even truly random variations must
    sometimes produce orderly results, results that, if accumulated, must
    necessarily look designed by almost any standard (and *certainly* by the
    low standard of ID theory, by which design is imputed to anything that lives).

    Because life is necessarily orderly, the question then becomes: Is design
    necessary for life as such?

    The answer is: No, not if prebiotic evolution can occur that evolves
    non-living molecules into living molecules (i.e., into energy-using
    molecules or systems of molecules). Whether this has occurred or not is not
    definitely known, but there is plenty of evidence that suggests that it
    *can* occur. This, combined with the fact that life *does* exist, is
    all-but-complete proof that something like this *has* occurred, at least
    somewhere in the Universe (probably right here in River City :-) ).



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 27 2000 - 11:48:41 EDT