Dear Bertvan
> If someone wants to define science as
>excluding the "supernatural", they must exclude free will, spontaneity,
and
>creativity. I am convinced they all exist as a part of reality.
However
>all three are at the present time"supernatural" in that science has no
>explanation for them - no way to measure or define them.
Agreed. Supernatural stuff is not less real than hard science, it is
analyzed by different rules.
Spontaneity and creativity are observable even if not physically
measurable.
I can't think of any observable characteristics for free will. Why do you
classify
it with spontaneity and creativity? Is not what people call free will
actually what we observe as spontaneity? Isn't free will primarially a
religious presupposition?
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 04 2000 - 13:59:50 EDT